Podcast · spreaker.com
The Pete Quiñones Show
Peter R Quiñones
Since July 2017, Pete Quiñones has been the host of The Pete Quiñones Show (previously known as Free Man Beyond the Wall). His program has focused on the opposition to the globalist project that has undermined historical endeavors. His current interests include philosophy and historical revisionism.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-pete-quinones-show--6071361/support.
289 claims · Clear filters
True60% confidence6 sourcesOct 1, 2026The Kievan state destroyed the Khazar Empire shortly before the turn of the first millennium.Said by BMultiple sources report that Sviatoslav of Kiev (Kievan Rus') destroyed Khazar imperial power, sacking Sarkel in 965 and the capital Atil around 968-969, so the core assertion holds. The 'shortly before the turn of the first millennium' timing is a loose reading, since 965-969 falls about three decades before ~1000, but no source contradicts it and the claim's phrasing tracks the passage.True90% confidence7 sourcesOct 1, 2026The British White Paper of 1939 restricted Jewish immigration to Mandatory Palestine.The sources consistently state that the 1939 White Paper limited Jewish immigration to Mandatory Palestine, capping it at 75,000 over five years and making further immigration contingent on Arab consent. The claim's wording is a faithful, if simplified, paraphrase of the passage, which refers to the White Paper as restricting immigration; the passage's own phrasing ('probably not give there so many Arabs') is loose but the core claim is supported.True80% confidence8 sourcesOct 1, 2026The Irgun was a radical Zionist group that targeted civilians.Said by 6BMultiple sources describe the Irgun as a revisionist Zionist paramilitary group that carried out attacks on Arab and British civilians, including the 1946 King David Hotel bombing and the 1948 Jaffa and Jerusalem bombings. The extraction is a faithful paraphrase of the passage. One scholarly source (Oxford chapter) argues the Irgun's strategy was not deliberately to target civilians and focused on British troops, which is a dissenting reading of strategy rather than a contradiction of the civilian attacks themselves.True90% confidence6 sourcesOct 1, 2026The Lehi organization sought an alliance with Germany.Said by BMultiple independent sources (Wikipedia, Nakba Memory Museum, Fanack, the Substack piece, the Lehi.org.il page, and reporting on declassified Haganah files) confirm that Lehi, under Avraham Stern, sought an alliance with Nazi Germany in 1940-41 with a proposal for a Jewish state linked to the German Reich. The claim's wording ('sought an alliance') matches the passage's 'talking about an alliance with Germany' and the post's reference to the Transfer Agreement is a peripheral detail not contradicted by sources; the post's 'for a long time' timing is loosely consistent with the 1940-41 attempts.True95% confidence8 sourcesOct 1, 2026The King David Hotel bombing occurred on July 22, 1946.Said by BMultiple independent tier1 and primary sources (BBC Witness History, Full Fact, Detroit Jewish News archive, Haaretz, Encyclopedia.com) state the King David Hotel bombing occurred on July 22, 1946, and the claim's date matches the passage's 'July 22nd of 46' without addition. The passage's reference to the bombing is resolved to the same event; no source contradicts the date.True95% confidence6 sourcesOct 1, 2026Yitzhak Shamir was a member of the Irgun.Said by BMultiple independent reliable sources, including Reuters, the BBC, and JTA, state that Yitzhak Shamir was a member of the Irgun before later joining the Lehi (Stern Gang). The extracted claim is a faithful, narrower version of the post's statement that he was part of the Irgun; the post's '90s' prime-ministerial timing is not part of the claim and is not contested.True85% confidence7 sourcesOct 1, 2026Approximately 100 people were killed in the King David Hotel bombing.Said by BThe sources consistently report 91 deaths in the July 22, 1946 King David Hotel bombing, which the claim's 'approximately 100' rounds loosely but within a reasonable range. The post itself says 'roughly 100 people, civilians', so the extraction matches the passage, though the sources also show many victims were not civilians (28 Britons, 41 Arabs, 17 Jews, and others, including 21 senior officials and 13 soldiers).True60% confidence6 sourcesOct 1, 2026Felix Frankfurter, Bernard Baruch, and Henry Morgenthau pressured the U.S. government regarding the partition of Palestine.Said by BSources support that Frankfurter lobbied the U.S. president, cabinet and State Department for partition, and that Baruch and Morgenthau were named as Zionist figures urged to press the President on Palestine policy. The evidence is thinner for Baruch and Morgenthau specifically, and Baruch's documented pressure was aimed at France and UN delegations, but no source contradicts the claim.True65% confidence7 sourcesOct 1, 2026Bernard Baruch confronted James Forrestal on February 3, 1948, regarding U.S. support for Jewish interests in Palestine.Said by BForrestal's diary entry for February 3, 1948, which several sources reproduce, records a lunch with Baruch in which Baruch advised him not to be active in opposing the UN Palestine policy, so the meeting and its Palestine subject are supported. The claim's word "confronted" overstates a lunch where Baruch advised rather than confronted, and the "alienate all these people" quote from the post does not appear in these sources.True90% confidence7 sourcesOct 1, 2026James Forrestal counseled against the partition plan for Palestine.Said by BMultiple independent primary and reference sources (the OSD Historical Office study, a Oklahoma State academic article, FRUS documents, and EBSCO) state that Secretary of Defense James Forrestal opposed the partition of Palestine, arguing it would endanger relations with Arab oil states and US interests. The claim faithfully reflects the passage, which says Forrestal 'really counseled against the partition plan'; the speaker's own words are not used as evidence.True85% confidence7 sourcesOct 1, 2026The Soviet Union provided diplomatic support to the Zionist movement in 1948.Said by BMultiple sources state the Soviet Union gave diplomatic support to the Zionist movement in 1948: it was the first state to extend de jure recognition to Israel on 17 May 1948, and it backed partition and the Jewish state at the UN. The claim's wording 'lavish' is rhetorical emphasis, and the passage's own accuracy about the Soviet role is corroborated by the sources; the extraction faithfully matches the passage.True65% confidence5 sourcesOct 1, 2026Andrei Gromyko made the speech at the United Nations supporting the partition of Palestine.Said by BMultiple sources report that Andrei Gromyko, the Soviet representative at the UN, gave speeches at the UN in support of partitioning Palestine, including the May 1947 speech that marked the Soviet shift to backing partition and the November 1947 General Assembly debate. The sources do not identify one speech as 'the main speech', but the core assertion that Gromyko made a UN speech supporting partition is supported. The claim's wording matches the post's own description, so it is not an extraction addition.