The abdication note of Tsar Nicholas II is a forgery created by the general staff.
Posted by The Pete Quiñones Show, Checked
- Sources
- 1 contradict1 support3 context
- Said
- 1 time·
- Confidence
- 75%
The Pete Quiñones ShowOct 1, 2026
The claim that the abdication note is a forgery is contradicted by the State Archive of the Russian Federation (GARF), which reports that expert handwriting analysis in 1929 and later examination confirmed the document's authenticity and rejected forgery claims.
What was said
… Well, Tsar Nicholas II, later canonized by the Russian Orthodox Church in Exile, as well as the Moscow Patriarch years later, never abdicate. The abdication note is foaming; it's a clumsy forgery put together by the general staff. Um, and in Russia, that's kind of well known. It was it was a typewritten, uh, which is was never the case for these kind of imperial statement, uh, partially to avoid forgery. So, and so, that's one of the many myths. …
The Pete Quiñones Show · · from the transcriptPost →What we found
Contradicts. GARF publishes the abdication act signed by Nicholas II and a 1929 handwriting expert report confirming its unconditional authenticity, rebutting 2016 online claims that the pencil signature and the minister's signature were forged.[1]
Supports. One low-credibility article asserts that the act was drafted and doctored by Guchkov, Shulgin and Danilov, after Nicholas signed some abdication document; this names individuals, not the general staff, and is not corroborated by authoritative sources.[2]
Context. Historians and a 2015 prosecutor argued the abdication was legally invalid because it was signed in pencil, but this is a legal-validity argument, not a forgery claim, and one source calls it baseless.[3][4]
Context. Hoover Institution archives hold drafts of the abdication manifesto prepared by Nicolas de Basily at Mogilev, showing the document was drafted and revised in versions, with Nicholas signing it, which is consistent with authenticity rather than forgery.[5]
Sources
5 sources: 5 not rated
- 1Подлинность акта отречения Николая II подтверждена ...statearchive.ru · not rated · cited for: contradicts
- 2DOCUMENTARY RECORDSON THE FIRST WORLDWARherald-of-an-archivist.com · not rated · cited for: supports
- 3November | 2022 | Nicholas IItsarnicholas.org · not rated · cited for: context
- 4The Abdication of Nicholas II: 100 Years Laterrussianlegitimist.org · not rated · cited for: context
- 5The Document That Ended an Empirehoover.org · not rated · cited for: context
Where this claim was made
Said in 1 published post
Related claims
- The Bolsheviks killed Czar Nicholas II and his family in a ritual.False
- The people who murdered Tsar Nicholas II were overwhelmingly Jewish.False
- Vladimir Lenin and Leon Trotsky were financed by the Western world during the Russian Revolution.Mixed
- The pogroms in late Imperial Russia are a myth.False
- Tsar Nicholas II was canonized by the Russian Orthodox Church in Exile and the Moscow Patriarch.True