Polygraph

Erich von dem Bach-Zelewski was an SS Obergruppenführer and Einsatzgruppen commander who was not prosecuted at Nuremberg.

Posted by The Pete Quiñones Show, Checked

Polygraph verdictTrue
Sources
5 support1 context
Said
1 time·
Confidence
85%
The Pete Quiñones ShowOct 10, 2026
View on Podcast ↗
Video frame
147 claimsThe check →

Multiple sources confirm Erich von dem Bach-Zelewski was an SS Obergruppenführer who led Einsatzgruppen and was never indicted or tried at Nuremberg; he testified as a prosecution witness, and was later tried by a German court. One picture-alliance caption says he was sworn in as a defendant, which conflicts with the other sources.

What was said

… And that was true in the Eichmann trial. What was relied upon was the ultimate source of that initial figure, and, uh, that was, uh, an SS Overgruppenführer, uhm, Vandenbeck-Zalewski. He was a general of the SS, and he was an Einstein group commander, and he was probably a British intelligence asset, which is why he wasn't prosecuted in Nuremberg. Later, Zalewski was indicted by the Bundesrepublik for a series of murders carried out during the, the, the 1934, um, Rom purge. …
The Pete Quiñones Show · · from the transcriptPost →

What we found

Supports. The BBC states he 'not only avoided an appearance in an Allied court but was actually found to be a helpful witness,' and that he was later tried by a West German court.[1]

Supports. An academic abstract states that he was 'never indicted, instead appearing as a witness for the prosecution' before the International Military Tribunal and successor trials.[2]

Supports. The Wikipedia article and a DW piece both say he did not stand trial at Nuremberg and was at the trials as a witness, not a defendant, in exchange for his testimony.[3][4]

Supports. The BBC describes him as the man who led the Einsatzgruppen, and a picture-alliance caption calls him a 'former SS Obergruppenführer and general of the police.'[1][5]

Contradicts. A picture-alliance caption says he was 'sworn in as defendant' at the Nuremberg trials on 7 January 1946, which conflicts with the other sources describing him as a witness and not indicted.[5]

Context. He was sentenced by a German court in 1951 for murders, which does not bear on whether he was prosecuted at Nuremberg.[2][6]

Sources

6 sources: 1 tier 1, 5 not rated

  1. 1History - World Wars: Making Justice at Nuremberg, 1945 - 1946 - BBCbbc.co.uk · tier 1 · cited for: supports
  2. 2Criminals as Manipulative Witnesses: A Case Study of SS ...academic.oup.com · not rated · cited for: supports, context
  3. 3Erich von dem Bach-Zelewski - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org · not rated · cited for: supports
  4. 4'Daddy was a man of honor'dw.com · not rated · cited for: supports
  5. 5Start of Nuremberg Trials (20.11.1945) - Picture Alliancepicture-alliance.com · not rated · cited for: contradicts, supports
  6. 6Ex-nazi General on Trial for Mass-executions of Jews Near Minsk - Jewish Telegraphic Agencyjta.org · not rated · cited for: context

Where this claim was made

Said in 1 published post

How Polygraph checks a claim

Our Weekly Newsletter

The Readout

The week's most-shared posts, checked. What they claimed, how they argued, and what held up.

Unsubscribe any time. See our privacy policy.