Podcast · spreaker.com
The Pete Quiñones Show
Peter R Quiñones
Since July 2017, Pete Quiñones has been the host of The Pete Quiñones Show (previously known as Free Man Beyond the Wall). His program has focused on the opposition to the globalist project that has undermined historical endeavors. His current interests include philosophy and historical revisionism.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-pete-quinones-show--6071361/support.
114 claims · Clear filters
Mixed60% confidence9 sourcesOct 1, 2026Heinrich Graetz was a German Jew who rejected the Zohar and the Talmud.Graetz's German Jewish identity and his rejection of the Zohar are supported, but sources show he was critical of the Talmud without rejecting it: he taught a Talmud preparatory course and wrote the Talmud-focused volume of his history, and a later source says he regarded the Talmud as relevant. The claim also departs from the passage's garbled wording, which the extraction resolved as 'and the Talmud'.Mixed60% confidence2 sourcesOct 1, 2026Count Potocki led an advance guard of 4,000 Polish mercenaries.The sources support that a Potocki (S. Potocki, son of Hetman Mikołaj Potocki) led a Polish advance guard at Zhovti Vody in 1648, but they put that force at 6,000 men, not 4,000, and none mention mercenaries. The post itself said Potocki was 'one of the leaders' and gave the 4,000 figure, so the claim's figure is contradicted by the record while its core identity is partly supported.Mixed50% confidence7 sourcesOct 1, 2026Old Believers became Cossacks two decades after the start of the Khmelnytsky uprising.Sources support that Old Believers fled after the 1666–67 schism to Don Cossack lands and allied with Cossack rebels, roughly two decades after the 1648 Khmelnytsky uprising. But they describe refuge and alliance rather than Old Believers becoming Cossacks, and one source describes the reverse flow, with many Cossacks becoming Old Believers.Mixed55% confidence4 sourcesOct 1, 2026The Zerdevsky Articles were a treaty between the Cossacks and the Russians that promised local autonomy.The Zherdivski (Zerdevsky) Articles of 1659 did propose a Cossack-Muscovite agreement that promised autonomy and limited Moscow's control, so the autonomy element is supported. But the sources say the articles were rejected by Trubetskoy and replaced by the Pereiaslav Articles, so calling them a treaty in force between the two sides is contradicted. The claim also departs slightly from the passage, which calls them 'another treaty' without naming the parties.Mixed50% confidence9 sourcesOct 1, 2026The Comtap Articles of 1672 imposed a hetman on Ukraine with no independence.The sources confirm that the 1672 Konotop Articles, which Moscow backed, installed Ivan Samoylovich as hetman and sharply curtailed hetman power, but they do not use the name "Comtap Articles" and describe the hetmanate as retaining broad autonomy, which contradicts "no independence whatsoever." The claim's wording also departs from the passage's garbled name, and the sources treat the Konotop Articles as a limitation rather than total loss of independence.Mixed55% confidence5 sourcesOct 1, 2026Russia began ruling Ukrainian lands directly in 1666 and 1667.The 1667 start of direct Russian control is well supported: the Truce of Andrusovo gave Russia the eastern (Left Bank) Ukraine, including Kyiv, and sources describe the east coming under direct Russian control then. The claim's 1666 date is not addressed by the sources, and one low-credibility source dates direct Tsarist command to the 1665 Moscow Articles, so the start date is only partly supported. The extraction matches the passage faithfully.Mixed50% confidence5 sourcesOct 1, 2026St. Petersburg was built on the bones of Cossacks who died during the city's construction.Sources support that Cossacks were among the conscripted workers who built St. Petersburg and that many laborers died, but none documents Cossacks dying in the literal "built on their bones" sense at a scale that establishes the claim. Historians dispute the death toll behind the "city on bones" phrase, and the extracted claim drops the post's Zepa-rebellion causal story, which no source addresses.Mixed55% confidence8 sourcesOct 1, 2026Prince Nikolai Repnin proclaimed the equality of Orthodox and Protestants with Catholics in Poland, including the right to hold government positions.Sources support that Repnin pressed for equality of Orthodox and Protestant dissidents with Catholics, and that Russian-backed pressure led to a religious-equality act. They conflict on whether political rights, including eligibility for government office, were granted, and the sources describe pressure and confederation acts rather than Repnin personally proclaiming equality.Mixed55% confidence6 sourcesOct 1, 2026Maxim Zeliznyak's rebellion began in May 1768 with 18 people.Sources confirm the rebellion began in May 1768 under Zalizniak, and one encyclopedia entry says his initial detachment numbered only 18. Other sources give conflicting starting numbers, including over 1,000 participants by late April and an eight-person core in autumn 1767, so the 18-person figure is contested rather than established.Mixed55% confidence6 sourcesOct 1, 2026Cossacks in regions including Terek, the Don, and the Volga rose up against the Communists between the Russian Revolution and the German invasion.Sources support Cossack uprisings against the Bolsheviks in the Terek and Don regions in 1918, but none mention a Volga uprising, and the claim that they rose up consistently right up to the German invasion is not supported. One source says Cossacks were defeated and persecuted in the 1920s and 1930s, which cuts against sustained revolt through 1941. The claim's scope also departs slightly from the passage, which the extraction reflects.Mixed60% confidence6 sourcesOct 1, 2026Jews were the core of the Bolsheviks in Russia in 1917.The claim that Jews were 'the core' of the Bolsheviks in 1917 is partly supported: Jews were a large share of the party's leadership, but they were a small minority of its membership, and most Jews did not back the Bolsheviks. The claim's wording departs from the passage only in that it drops the 'in poor Russia' framing, which is a faithful paraphrase, so it is graded normally.Mixed60% confidence7 sourcesOct 1, 2026Karl Marx was Jewish.Sources agree Marx was born to Jewish parents with rabbinic ancestry, but he was baptized as a Christian and never practiced Judaism, so whether he 'was Jewish' depends on whether ancestry or religious identity is meant. The claim holds on the ancestry reading and is contradicted by Foxman's view, quoted in one source, that Marx was not Jewish on the religious reading. The extracted claim matches the post's 'He was a Jew' with 'he' resolving to Marx.