Podcast · spreaker.com
The Pete Quiñones Show
Peter R Quiñones
Since July 2017, Pete Quiñones has been the host of The Pete Quiñones Show (previously known as Free Man Beyond the Wall). His program has focused on the opposition to the globalist project that has undermined historical endeavors. His current interests include philosophy and historical revisionism.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-pete-quinones-show--6071361/support.
521 claims · Clear filters
False85% confidence5 sourcesOct 1, 2026There were no sanctions on the Soviet Union until the 1970s.The claim is contradicted by the sources, which document US and Western sanctions on the Soviet Union well before the 1970s, including a 1933 British measure, the 1948 US export restrictions, and the 1949 Export Control Act. The post's claim that the sources refer to in the 1970s is not supported by the historical record given here.False60% confidence6 sourcesOct 1, 2026Stalin was not an anti-Semite.The claim that Stalin was not an anti-Semite is contradicted by most of the provided sources, which document anti-Jewish repression and encouragement of anti-Semitic tropes, especially late in his life. A minority of partisan sources argue there is no evidence he was anti-Semitic, and Reuters' fact-check addresses only claims of Jewish ancestry, not anti-Semitism. The claim also departs slightly from the passage, which calls the accusation 'nonsense' rather than stating 'not an anti-Semite' outright, but the grading is the same.False80% confidence7 sourcesOct 1, 2026Soviet debts from World War II were canceled.The claim that Soviet World War II debts were canceled is contradicted by sources showing the Lend-Lease debt was settled through repayment agreements (1972, then a 1993 Russian repayment agreement) and paid off by 2006, not canceled. The only cancellation in the sources concerns 1918 Tsarist debts, a different matter. The extraction matches the passage faithfully.False90% confidence6 sourcesOct 1, 2026The United States was not anti-communist during the Cold War.Authoritative primary sources (State Department, Truman Library, NPS, American Yawp, history.state.gov) document that U.S. foreign policy during the Cold War was explicitly anti-communist, through the Truman Doctrine, containment, and NSC-68. The claim that the U.S. was not anti-communist, and that its Cold War actions had nothing to do with ideology, is contradicted by these sources.False80% confidence7 sourcesOct 1, 2026Pogroms were stories invented to cover up Jewish violence during the Soviet era.Said by 10BThe claim that pogroms were invented stories covering up Jewish violence is contradicted by the sources, which document pogroms as real, mass violence against Jews by non-Jewish perpetrators in 1881–84, 1903–06, and 1918–21, with the Soviet-era sources describing rare but real pogroms. The post's 'Jewish violence' framing appears nowhere in the sources, which describe the violence as directed against Jews.Reported in the post, not stated as its own.False50% confidence4 sourcesOct 1, 2026World War I was partially a way for Britain to get Germany and the Russian Empire to fight each other.The claim that Britain aimed to make Germany and Russia fight each other is not stated by any source. The sources instead describe Britain allied with Russia in the Triple Entente, designed to hem in Germany, and Britain entering the war to honour its commitment to Belgium, which cuts against the claimed British strategy. The claim is a fringe causal interpretation that the mainstream causal accounts do not support.False95% confidence7 sourcesOct 1, 2026Tsar Nicholas II never abdicated the throne.Said by 15CThe sources uniformly and directly contradict the claim: Nicholas II abdicated on March 2/15, 1917, renouncing the throne for himself and his son in favor of his brother Grand Duke Michael, as shown by the primary abdication document and MIT and Library of Congress materials. The claimant's assertion that the abdication was a forgery is not supported by any source.False75% confidence5 sourcesOct 1, 2026The abdication note of Tsar Nicholas II is a forgery created by the general staff.Said by 15CThe claim that the abdication note is a forgery is contradicted by the State Archive of the Russian Federation (GARF), which reports that expert handwriting analysis in 1929 and later examination confirmed the document's authenticity and rejected forgery claims. Only a low-credibility source says the text was doctored, and it names Guchkov, Shulgin and Danilov rather than the general staff; the passage's 'clumsy forgery' wording is the claimant's own assertion and is not evidence.False60% confidence3 sourcesOct 1, 2026The Petrograd Soviet had 300 members, of whom 271 were Jews.No source gives the claimed 300-member total or the 271-Jewish count for the Petrograd Soviet. The sources that do give figures put the Soviet at almost 3,000 deputies (Wikipedia) and the wider Soviet elite at about 3,000, of whom nearly 300 were Jews (HSE), which contradicts the claimed total by roughly an order of magnitude. The claim's '300 members' also drops the post's 'almost 300'.False60% confidence7 sourcesOct 1, 2026The Bolsheviks received approximately 20% of the vote in the Russian Constituent Assembly election.Multiple sources put the Bolsheviks' national vote share in the 1917 Constituent Assembly election at roughly 24-25%, not about 20%. The claim's figure falls outside that range, and the 20% figure in the source appears only for the earlier Petrograd district council elections.False85% confidence5 sourcesOct 1, 2026By the start of World War I, 95% of the Russian peasantry owned their own land.The claim that 95% of the Russian peasantry owned their own land by the start of World War I is contradicted by several sources. Peasants mostly held land communally, and only about one-quarter had secured individual ownership of their allotments by 1914, with fewer than 5% owning land individually. The passage's claim departs from nothing in the extraction; the figure itself is the problem.False60% confidence3 sourcesOct 1, 2026In 1918, the Soviet government declared private trade a crime punishable by death.The claim that the Soviet government declared private trade a crime punishable by death in 1918 is not supported by the sources. The November 1918 Sovnarkom decree abolished private trade without mentioning death, and a historian's review says the February 1918 law allowed execution of private traders only when they offered armed resistance, with the regime tolerating trade by September 1918. The extraction matches the passage faithfully.