Podcast · ms.now
The Briefing with Jen Psaki
MS NOW, Jen Psaki
Jen Psaki tackles the biggest issues of the week and features one-on-one interviews with newsmakers.
90 claims
True80% confidence7 sourcesSep 24, 2026Thomas Forsad founded the magazine High Times.Said by AThe sources consistently identify the founder of High Times as Thomas King Forçade (also spelled Forcade or Forsad), who was born Gary Goodson, so the claim that Thomas Forsad founded the magazine is supported. The claim's spelling is a variant of the same person's name, and the claim does not depart from the passage.True80% confidence4 sourcesSep 24, 2026A federal judge found that the government's failure to devise, publicize, and utilize narrow and specific standards for the issuance or denial of press passes infringes on First Amendment rights.Said by AThe claim matches the post's passage, which describes a federal judge's ruling on White House press passes. The primary court opinions in Forcade v. Knight (D.D.C. 1976) and Sherrill v. Knight (D.C. Cir. 1977) support it: Forcade found that the lack of written standards for press passes violated the plaintiff's First Amendment right to freedom of the press, and Sherrill called for 'narrow and specific' standards to be devised and publicized. The 2026 rulings on Trump-era press access, which rested mainly on the Fifth Amendment, are a different matter and do not change this verdict.True60% confidence4 sourcesSep 24, 2026Thomas K. Forsad was the project coordinator of the Underground Press Syndicate.Said by ASources identify Thomas King Forçade (spelled 'Forsad' in the post) as the project coordinator of the Underground Press Syndicate, and other sources say he took over and ran the UPS. The post's 'Forsad' spelling appears to be a variant of the same person, and the extraction matches the passage's wording.Reported in the post, not stated as its own.True85% confidence8 sourcesSep 24, 2026The court found that the government's failure to inform plaintiffs of the evidence or grounds for denying press pass applications violates their Fifth Amendment right to procedural due process.Said by AThe claim matches the holdings in the press-pass cases: the D.C. Circuit in Sherrill v. Knight (1977) and the district court in Forcade v. Knight (1976) held that the Secret Service must inform applicants of the evidence and grounds for denial, and that denial without this violates Fifth Amendment procedural due process. The claim drops the post's 'opportunity to rebut' element, which is a faithful simplification, and the 2026 Kelly TRO rests on the same due process reasoning.True90% confidence4 sourcesSep 24, 2026The appeals court ruled that the White House could not arbitrarily deny press passes in the case of Robert Sherill.Said by AThe 1977 D.C. Circuit decision in Sherrill v. Knight held that the First Amendment requires that White House press access not be denied arbitrarily or for less than compelling reasons, so the claim is supported. The ruling was conditional on the White House having opened press facilities, and it concerned Robert Sherrill (spelled 'Sherrill' in the sources, 'Sherill' in the claim), so the claim is a fair paraphrase of the holding.True95% confidence6 sourcesSep 24, 2026Three news organizations sued the Trump administration over its decision to ban journalists from the White House.Said by AMultiple tier-1 and tier-2 sources (Reuters, AP, NPR, NYT, Jurist) report that CNN, MS NOW and Politico sued the Trump administration on September 21, 2026 over its ban of their journalists from the White House, which matches the claim as of the posting date. The claim faithfully paraphrases the post, which also said 'including this one' (the post's own outlet, which the claim omits without changing its substance).True93% confidence8 sourcesSep 24, 2026A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order restoring Jim Acosta's press pass after he was banned by Donald Trump in 2018.Said by AMultiple reliable sources from November 2018 confirm that U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly issued a temporary restraining order ordering the White House to restore CNN's Jim Acosta's press pass after CNN sued. The sources describe the pass as revoked by the Trump administration after Acosta's November 7, 2018 clash with Trump, which matches the claim's 'banned by Donald Trump in 2018' framing. The claim departs from the passage in no material way.True85% confidence7 sourcesSep 24, 2026The Trump administration argued in court that the president should be able to take immediate action to protect national security regarding the revocation of press passes.Said by ACourt coverage from the September 23, 2026 hearing reports that Justice Department lawyer Michael Velchik told the court, "The president should be able to take immediate action to protect national security," and NPR confirms the DOJ stressed national security as grounds to strip the passes. The claim matches the post's passage and the sources as of 2026-09-24; later rulings rejected that national security rationale, but that does not change what was argued.Reported in the post, not stated as its own.True85% confidence7 sourcesSep 24, 2026The Trump administration claimed that three news organizations published classified information.Said by AThe Trump administration did claim in court filings (Sept. 23 letters and DOJ filing) that CNN, MS NOW and Politico published sensitive or classified information, as reported by multiple tier1 and tier2 outlets, and used this to justify the ban. The claim is true as of 2026-09-24; the record notes that the letters did not actually identify classified content, but that goes to the strength of the claim, not whether it was made.Reported in the post, not stated as its own.True92% confidence9 sourcesSep 24, 2026Donald Trump revoked Jim Acosta's press pass the day after the 2018 midterm election.Said by AThe White House revoked CNN correspondent Jim Acosta's press pass on November 7, 2018, which was the day after the 2018 midterm elections, as multiple sources report. The post's framing of a ban tied to the post-midterm press conference matches this record, and the revocation was later reversed by a court order and the White House's restoration of the pass.True60% confidence4 sourcesSep 24, 2026The Political Report has moved their ratings for several key races in conservative states toward Democrats.Said by AThe sources show the Cook Political Report moving several races toward Democrats in late September and October 2026, including a New York House seat (NY-21) published September 26 and a September 28 Cook roundtable on rating shifts. The record does not clearly show that these moves were in conservative states as of September 24, and the clearest red-state shifts (Alaska, Nebraska, Oklahoma) came in mid-October, after the claim date.True90% confidence7 sourcesSep 24, 2026A Wall Street Journal analysis found that the number of times conservative podcasts mentioned Donald Trump's name has dropped.The Wall Street Journal's analysis of about 70,000 hours of conservative podcasts, published September 23, 2026, found that mentions of Trump's name on those shows had dropped sharply, roughly 70% from their pre-2024-election peak and about 30% since the Iran war began in late February. As of the claim date (2026-09-24) this was true, and the claim's wording matches the passage's own framing of a dramatic drop.