Polygraph

The federal government matched U.S. Customs and Immigration Enforcement information with voter information to identify the 20,000 allegedly ineligible voters.

Posted by The John Phillips Show, Checked

Polygraph verdictTrue
Sources
4 support1 context
Said
1 time·
Confidence
80%
The John Phillips ShowOct 17, 2026
View on Podcast ↗
Video frame
43 claimsThe check →

The federal government did match federal immigration data against California voter-roll information to flag about 20,000 likely noncitizen registrants, as the DOJ, CNN, Axios and The Hill all report.

This claim is about the present, so it is judged as of the day it was checked.

What was said

… So they and, well, noting that this isn't a widespread issue, and California has 23 million voters, they're mentioning 20,000, and in the lawsuit it does say how they came to this conclusion. They essentially took the U.S. Customs and Immigration Enforcement information and matched that with the information of these voters. I mean, given that it is in the context of California's voters, like, why not just do what Nevada did and just check and verify that they're wrong? …
The John Phillips Show · · from the transcriptPost →

What we found

Supports. The DOJ press release says Homeland Security Investigations, with federal partners, analyzed publicly available voter-registration records to identify potential indicators that aliens had registered or voted, producing a list of more than 20,000 likely noncitizens.[1]

Supports. CNN reports the 20,000 figure was derived from public voter registration information the government obtained, with DHS and USCIS comparing voter rolls against the agency's internal immigration records.[2]

Supports. Axios reports the lawsuit says USCIS and ICE's investigative arm compiled the list using agency data and records from the Social Security Administration and State Department.[4]

Supports. The Hill reports the DOJ sent California a list of over 20,000 names of people the federal government believes are likely noncitizens, to be compared with DHS-provided information.[3]

Context. A CHIRLA analysis filed around Nov. 1 found more than 40% of listed people do not appear in the state voter file, and DOJ defended the list's accuracy. This disputes the list's accuracy, not whether the matching took place.[5]

Sources

5 sources: 1 primary, 2 tier 2, 1 tier 1, 1 not rated

  1. 1Central District of California | United States Sues ...justice.gov · primary source · cited for: supports
  2. 2Trump admin files ‘long shot’ lawsuit after California wouldn ...cnn.com · tier 2 · cited for: supports
  3. 3DOJ sues California after pushing state to match voter list with USB ...thehill.com · tier 1 · cited for: supports
  4. 4Trump sues California over voters rolls three weeks ...axios.com · not rated · cited for: supports
  5. 5Justice Department urges sanctions for database analysis ...pbs.org · tier 2 · cited for: context

Where this claim was made

Said in 1 published post

How Polygraph checks a claim

Our Weekly Newsletter

The Readout

The week's most-shared posts, checked. What they claimed, how they argued, and what held up.

Unsubscribe any time. See our privacy policy.