The Dachau trial was primarily concerned with the Malmedy massacre.
Posted by The Pete Quiñones Show, Checked
- Sources
- 5 support
- Said
- 1 time·
- Confidence
- 70%
The Pete Quiñones ShowOct 10, 2026
The Malmedy massacre trial, held at Dachau in May-July 1946, was centered on the Waffen-SS killings of American POWs and Belgian civilians at Malmedy, and Wikipedia states that massacre was the primary subject of the trial. The claim's referent is the Malmedy trial rather than the broader Dachau trials series, which is the reading the sources support.
What was said
… I suggested last episode a lot of what was entered into the record as, as factual evidence at Nuremberg and at the Dachau trials. The Dachau trial was very different. I mean, it had to do with the Malmedy massacre, first and foremost; it didn't have to do with the camp at Dachau. It was simply how it was simply held there, but in both instances, what was entered into the record to substantiate the elements of the indictments, it was testimony by witnesses whose claims contradicted one another, as well as the factual record, as a, you …
The Pete Quiñones Show · · from the transcriptPost →What we found
Supports. The LOC primary record identifies the Malmedy trial as United States v. Valentin Bersin et al., held at Dachau from 16 May to 16 July 1946, and the Malmedy massacre is its subject.[1]
Supports. Wikipedia states the Waffen-SS massacre of 84 U.S. POWs near Baugnez was the primary subject of the Malmedy trial, which was one of the Dachau Trials.[2]
Supports. The National WWII Museum describes the Malmedy Massacre Trial as one component of the Dachau Trials, centered on crimes by the Waffen SS against American POWs and Belgian civilians.[3]
Supports. Smithsonian and Remy both describe the trial at Dachau as charging the Malmedy-area crimes of the Kampfgruppe Peiper and its commanders.[4][5]
Context. The claim is ambiguous because 'the Dachau trial' could refer to the whole series of Dachau trials, which covered other cases; the sources support the claim only on the Malmedy-trial reading.[2][3]
Sources
5 sources: 1 primary, 4 not rated
- 1World War II - Military Legal Resourcesloc.gov · primary source · cited for: supports
- 2Malmedy massacre trial - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org · not rated · cited for: supports, context
- 3Justice After the 1944 Malmedy Massacre | New Orleansnationalww2museum.org · not rated · cited for: supports, context
- 4www.smithsonianmag.com · history · senator-mccarthysWhen Senator Joe McCarthy Defended Nazis - Smithsonian Magazinesmithsonianmag.com · not rated · cited for: supports
- 5The Malmedy Massacre: The War Crimes Trial ControversySteven P. Remyacademic.oup.com · not rated · cited for: supports
Where this claim was made
Said in 1 published post
Related claims
- The Malmedy massacre involved the killing of American POWs by Sepp Dietrich and Joachim Peiper's forces.True
- Witnesses in the Adolf Eichmann trial provided testimony about gas chambers at Ravensbrück and Dachau.Can’t tell
- Erich von dem Bach-Zelewski was an SS Obergruppenführer and Einsatzgruppen commander who was not prosecuted at Nuremberg.True
- There were no gas chambers at Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen, Theresienstadt, Mauthausen, or Ravensbruck.False
- The International Military Tribunal charged German officials with criminal conspiracy 15 years before the Eichmann trial.True