Polygraph

Over 95% of Americans are nutrient deficient.

Posted by The MeidasTouch Podcast, Checked

Polygraph verdictFalse
Sources
1 contradict5 context
Said
1 time·
Confidence
60%
The MeidasTouch PodcastSep 15, 2026
View on Podcast ↗
Video frame
80 claimsThe check →

The claim that over 95% of Americans are nutrient deficient is contradicted by the CDC's Second Nutrition Report, which found less than 10% of the U.S. population had deficiencies for the indicators it measured.

An ad makes this claim. It counts as passed on, not against the post.

This claim is about the present, so it is judged as of the day it was checked.

What was said

… The Absorption Company is singularly focused on solving the biggest problem in supplements: low absorption. Most supplements absorb at less than 16%, meaning over 84% of the supplements we take are completely wasted. 77% of Americans take supplements daily, and we spend about $60 billion per year on supplements, yet over 95% of us are still nutrient deficient. The supplements we're taking every day do not absorb well enough to work. The Absorption Company uses cutting-edge technologies to make supplements with pharmaceutical-grade absorption, up to 149 times better than standard supplements. …
The MeidasTouch Podcast · · from the transcriptPost →

What we found

Contradicts. The CDC's Second Nutrition Report (NHANES 2003-2006 biochemical data) found less than 10% of the U.S. population had nutrition deficiencies for selected indicators, directly contradicting a claim that over 95% are deficient.[1]

Context. Dietary intake data show high shares of Americans falling short of recommended intakes (e.g., 94.3% below the vitamin D requirement in NHANES 2007-2010), but this measures dietary inadequacy rather than clinical nutrient deficiency.[2][3]

Context. The 95% figure appears only in unrated sources (a Dr. Hyman transcript claiming 95% are deficient in at least one essential nutrient, and a Real Simple piece citing 95% lacking enough vitamin D), which do not cite a primary deficiency study and are weaker than the CDC data.[5][6]

Context. Fact-checking sources on related nutrition-status claims are not directly on this figure; the 2026 PMC study reports only small temporal changes in deficiency prevalence, not a 95% figure.[4]

Sources

6 sources: 4 primary, 2 not rated

  1. 1CDC’s Second Nutrition Report A comprehensive biochemical assessment of thenutrition status of the U.S. populationcdc.gov · primary source · cited for: contradicts
  2. 2Micronutrient Inadequacies in the US Population: an Overviewlpi.oregonstate.edu · primary source · cited for: context
  3. 3Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020-2025dietaryguidelines.gov · primary source · cited for: context
  4. 4The Prevalence of Nutritional Imbalances in the US Population Over ...pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · primary source · cited for: context
  5. 5Are You Missing These Key Nutrients? Dietitians Say ... - Real Simplerealsimple.com · not rated · cited for: context
  6. 6Best Supplements for Optimal Health & Longevity - Transcriptdrhyman.com · not rated · cited for: context

Where this claim was made

Said in 1 published post

How Polygraph checks a claim

Our Weekly Newsletter

The Readout

The week's most-shared posts, checked. What they claimed, how they argued, and what held up.

Unsubscribe any time. See our privacy policy.