292 - Jason Stanley: Breaking Down Trump’s Propaganda

What it claims

Claims

1. 1TrueJason Stanley is the Bissell-Heyd-Associates Chair in American Studies at the Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy at the University of Toronto.Multiple independent sources, including the University of Toronto's own faculty page (published 2026-10-06), the Munk School people page (published 2026-11-01), and a 2025 U of T news release, identify Jason Stanley as the Bissell-Heyd-Associates Chair in American Studies at the Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy at the University of Toronto. The sources show the appointment began in 2025, so it held on the claim date of 2026-09-23. The extraction faithfully drops only the trailing 'where he is also Professor of Philosophy' clause, which sources also support.7 sources →
2. 2TrueJason Stanley moved from Yale University to the University of Toronto in 2025.Multiple independent sources confirm that Jason Stanley left Yale University, where he was a philosophy professor, and moved to the University of Toronto in 2025. The claim is a faithful paraphrase of the passage, which says he moved to Toronto in 2025 from the Jacob Urowsky Professorship at Yale.6 sources →
3. 3TrueJason Stanley authored the book Erasing History: How Fascists Rewrite the Past to Control the Future, published by Atria/One Signal in 2024.Multiple sources confirm that Jason Stanley wrote Erasing History: How Fascists Rewrite the Past to Control the Future, published by Atria/One Signal in 2024. The claim's dropped qualifier ('most recent book') is faithful to the passage, and the only variation is a minor imprint label on the author's site (One Signal Press), which does not change the core assertion.5 sources →
4. 4OpinionDonald Trump is leading the United States into authoritarianism and is ruining democracy.A judgement, not a statement of fact. It has no true or false answer.
5. 5TrueRobinson Erhardt researches symbolic logic and the foundations of mathematics at Stanford University.The Stanford Department of Philosophy profile of Robinson Erhardt states that he researches symbolic logic and the foundations of mathematics, which matches the claim as of 2026-09-23. The extraction dropped the JD-candidate clause from the passage, which is a permitted qualifier omission and not a contradiction.9 sources →
6. 6Can’t tellRobinson Erhardt is a JD candidate at Stanford Law School.The claim faithfully matches the post's bio line, but every source that repeats it is a podcast listing or aggregator copy of the show's own description, which is circular and not independent confirmation. No independent record such as a Stanford directory or registrar listing addresses his JD candidacy, so the claim cannot be graded as of 2026-09-23.12 sources →
7. 7TrueJason Stanley's book How Propaganda Works was published in 2015.Multiple sources show How Propaganda Works by Jason Stanley was published in 2015 (Princeton University Press, hardcover 2015, paperback 2016), including a Times Higher Education review dated August 2015 and Wikipedia and Muse listings. The claim faithfully matches the passage, where the speaker refers to 'My book, How Propaganda Works'; the Princeton Press page listing 2027 dates is a paperback/ebook reissue date and does not contradict the original 2015 publication.6 sources →

   ▶ 0:42

8. 8MixedThe United States incarcerated its citizens at seven to eight times the rate of any other liberal democracy during the period Jason Stanley was writing his book.The record supports a multiple of roughly seven times for the US against Western European democracies, but the ratio is smaller against other liberal democracies and the sources give a range of 3 to 12 times depending on the comparator and year. The claim's 'any other liberal democracy' framing and its 7-8x figure therefore hold only under some comparisons, and the sources do not show the 2015 book period directly.4 sources →

   ▶ 2:09

9. 9TrueThe State of Israel employed soft propaganda towards American Jews for a very long time.Sources describe Israeli state efforts to shape opinion among American Jews over several decades, including covert back-channel campaigns from the 1950s to the late 1970s and a 1975 Time piece on Israel's propaganda effort backed by major Jewish organizations, which supports the claim's 'for a very long time' framing. No source contradicts it, though the evidence is mostly tier-2 reporting and historical coverage rather than a direct fact-check of this specific statement.3 sources →

   ▶ 5:12

10. 10TrueFrank Luntz wrote an Israel report for how to talk to American elites.Multiple sources report that Frank Luntz wrote an internal Israel messaging report, 'The Israel Project's 2009 Global Language Dictionary', advising spokespeople on how to talk to Americans about Israel. The sources describe its audience as Americans and media/opinion spokespeople rather than 'American elites' specifically, a minor imprecision that does not defeat the core claim.7 sources →

    ▶ 5:25

11. 11TrueDonald Trump is attacking the vote and the election system.Multiple reliable sources, including AP, Reuters, and NYT, document Trump repeatedly attacking the integrity of U.S. voting and the election system, including false fraud claims and federal actions against election officials, in the months before 2026-09-23. The extracted claim is a faithful paraphrase of the passage, and the post's 'explicitly attacking the vote' is supported.5 sources →

    ▶ 9:26

12. 12TrueThere have been very few cases of in-person voter fraud in all elections over decades.The claim that there have been very few in-person voter fraud cases over decades is strongly supported by multiple sources: News21 found 10 in-person impersonation cases from 2000 to 2012, Brennan Center research finds in-person impersonation fraud extraordinarily rare, and FactCheck.org and PolitiFact both document its rarity. The extracted claim matches the passage's own statement faithfully.8 sources →

    ▶ 9:41

13. 13TrueRepublicans were employing the fiction of voter fraud in 2015.Sources show Republicans were driving voter-fraud rhetoric and voter-ID and restriction measures in 2015, and that documented voter fraud, especially by non-citizens, is extremely rare. The claim's characterization of this rhetoric as a 'fiction' is consistent with that evidence, though no source states the 2015 'undocumented voters' framing in those exact terms.5 sources →

    ▶ 9:53

14. 14TrueThe Republican Party employed the claim that undocumented people were illegally voting in 2015.Sources show Republican figures making the claim that undocumented immigrants vote illegally in the years around 2015: Snopes reports Trump made such claims from a 2014 tweet onward, and Boston Review says Republican Kobach claimed alien voting was 'pervasive' during the Obama years. No source directly dates a party-wide 2015 campaign, and the coverage is largely of individuals rather than the party as a whole, so confidence is moderate. The claim tracks the post's 'the Republicans... in 2015' wording, which is a faithful paraphrase.5 sources →

    ▶ 9:53

15. 15TrueThe Alternative for Deutschland party does not have federal power in Germany.As of 2026-09-23, the AfD had no seat in any federal government: AP reports it has never been part of any state or federal government, and the mainstream parties' firewall kept it out of power. The post's phrase about federal power matches this, and later coverage through November 2026 still shows no federal role.6 sources →

    ▶ 11:29

16. 16TrueIndia is ranked 157th on the press freedom index.India's 2026 rank of 157th out of 180 countries in Reporters Without Borders' World Press Freedom Index is confirmed by the RSF country page and multiple tier1 wire reports, and it was the current ranking on 2026-09-23. The claimant's spoken '154th' is not supported, but the extracted claim's 157th figure is correct.6 sources →

    ▶ 12:50

17. 17TrueAlice Crary published a paper in 2018 or 2019 that critiqued the model of propaganda presented in the book How Propaganda Works.Sources show Alice Crary's 2018 article "The Methodological as Political" critiques Stanley's How Propaganda Works, arguing its neutrality-based framing is problematic. The sources describe the target as the book's neutrality assumptions rather than the specific cognitive model of propaganda the podcast passage mentions, so the claim is supported in substance but the exact framing is not directly confirmed.3 sources →

    ▶ 14:48

18. 18TrueJason Stanley and David Beaver spent eight years writing the book The Politics of Language.Yale News reports that The Politics of Language, co-authored by Jason Stanley and David Beaver, was 'eight years in the writing,' which matches the claim. The extraction is faithful to the passage, and the publisher and review sources confirm the authors and title, though only one source directly addresses the eight-year figure.3 sources →

    ▶ 17:21

19. 19FalseHaitian immigrants in Springfield are eating cats and dogs.Multiple tier1 fact-checkers (Reuters, FactCheck.org, PolitiFact, AP) and Springfield officials found no credible evidence that Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, eat cats and dogs; the claim was widely debunked as baseless. The claim is a general present-tense assertion, and the authoritative dismissals directly contradict it.6 sources →

    ▶ 22:01

20. 20TrueDonald Trump represents himself as protecting democratic elections in order to undermine democracy and elections.Sources support the core of the claim: Trump presents himself as defending free and fair elections while making unsubstantiated fraud claims and taking actions that critics say undermine trust in elections. The 'in order to' motive is interpretive, and the White House disputes it, but no source contradicts the pattern. As of 2026-09-23, the record reflects this pattern, and later coverage (October) reinforces it.7 sources →

    ▶ 23:21

21. 21TrueDonald Trump promised $5,000 payments to American adults if Republicans retain Congress.Multiple tier-1 sources (AP, Reuters, PolitiFact) confirm Trump publicly pledged on September 9, 2026 at the GOP midterm convention to give every American adult $5,000 if Republicans retain control of Congress; the claim's core matches the passage and the sources. The pledge's legality, cost, and funding are disputed, but the claim only asserts the promise was made.6 sources →

    ▶ 25:30

22. 22PredictionDonald Trump will try to win the 2026 midterm elections by undemocratic means rather than by persuading more voters.Can't be checked yet. We check it after Nov 3, 2026.

    ▶ 28:26

23. 23TrueDonald Trump is planning to win the midterms by manipulating the system.Sources document a sustained administration push to shape the 2026 midterms through federal pressure, legal action and gerrymandering, including a DOJ suit to block Alaska's certification if Republicans lose, which fits the 'manipulating the system' reading. The claim drops the original post's hedge ('seems to want'), and the sources do not show a plan to win outright, only to influence the result; a Reuters report says the White House is also preparing for a Democratic takeover. As of 2026-09-23 the record supports the core assertion at moderate confidence, though 'manipulating' is an interpretive label that critics apply to largely legal-looking mechanisms.4 sources →

    ▶ 28:38

24. 24TrueThe Supreme Court of the United States rejected an attempt by Donald Trump to limit mail-in voting.Multiple tier1 and tier2 outlets (Reuters, AP, BBC, NYT, NPR, CNN) report that on September 14, 2026 the Supreme Court declined to let the Postal Service enforce a rule restricting mail ballots, rejecting Trump's push to restrict mail-in voting. The post's wording is faithfully extracted, and the claim departs from the passage only in naming the Court and Trump explicitly, which the rest of the post and sources support. An earlier August 2026 Supreme Court stay favored the administration on procedural (standing) grounds, but that does not change the September rejection the claim describes.8 sources →

    ▶ 28:52

25. 25Can’t tellDonald Trump's destruction of the U.S. security apparatus could result in a terrorist attack on American soil that he would use to win the midterms.The claim is a conditional forecast: a possible future terrorist attack that Trump would later exploit to win the midterms. Sources document reduced counterterrorism capacity and experts' warnings of elevated risk, but none reports an attack or any use of one to influence the midterms, so the claim cannot be graded as true or false. The extraction's framing of a terror-driven midterm strategy matches the post's own speculation, not a sourced fact.5 sources →

    ▶ 29:20

26. 26TrueJason Stanley's mother worked as a court stenographer in Manhattan Criminal Court starting in 1985.Multiple sources, including Stanley's own 2018 and 2025 interviews, say his mother was a court stenographer in Manhattan Criminal Court for 33 years, and a 2025 talk says she worked there during the Central Park 5 case. No source states the 1985 start year directly, but 33 years of service ending around 2018 is consistent with a 1985 start, and no source contradicts it.4 sources →

    ▶ 30:44

27. 27TrueDonald Trump has stated that he does not care if people call him a tyrant and that he could be a dictator if he wanted to be.Sources show Trump repeatedly saying he would be a dictator 'for one day' or 'on day one,' and a 2026 Daily Beast report quotes him saying he doesn't mind being called a 'brilliant tyrant dictator.' The claim's gist holds, though no source uses the exact 'if he wanted to be' phrasing and the sources frame the dictator remark as limited rather than unqualified.8 sources →

    ▶ 31:33

28. 28TrueDaron Acemoglu is a Nobel Prize-winning economist from MIT.Multiple independent tier1 and primary sources confirm Daron Acemoglu won the 2024 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences and is an MIT economist, so the claim holds as of 2026-09-23. The post's spelling 'Darren Asimoglu' is a misspelling of the same person, and the extraction's correction of the name is not a substantive change.5 sources →

    ▶ 33:00

29. 29TrueThe Russian government used tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of fake accounts to create outrage during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.Sources support the core assertion that Russian-linked operatives ran a large fake-account operation during 2016, with Twitter disclosures alone linking about 50,258 bot accounts to the effort, which fits the 'tens of thousands' part of the claim. The sources do not directly support 'hundreds of thousands' as a total, and the 'create outrage' framing is an interpretation of the documented divisive content, but the range is satisfied by the record.5 sources →

    ▶ 38:45

30. 30Can’t tellRussian-directed fake accounts used Hillary Clinton's 'super predator' remark to target voters in Metro Detroit to suppress the anti-Trump vote in the 2016 election.The sources document a Russian (IRA) social media campaign that disparaged Clinton and, per the indictment, aimed to suppress the minority vote, but none of them mentions the 'super predator' remark or Metro Detroit targeting. The claim's specific mechanism and location are therefore not addressed, and the speaker's account of a presentation is not evidence.4 sources →

    ▶ 39:00

31. 31Can’t tellJason Stanley was invited to a State Department conference on propaganda at the Hoover Institute in 2017.None of the sources state that Jason Stanley was invited to a State Department propaganda conference at the Hoover Institute in 2017. The closest material is a May 2017 Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy report that was convened at Stanford's Hoover Institution, but it does not mention Stanley, and a Yale conference where he spoke in 2017 is a different event. The extraction faithfully matches the post, which is the claimant's own account and cannot corroborate itself.6 sources →

    ▶ 41:47

32. 32Can’t tellJason Stanley was invited to a conference with the CIA in 2017.The sources do not show Stanley being invited to or attending a conference with the CIA in 2017. The post itself says he was invited to a State Department propaganda conference at the Hoover Institute and was 'at a conference with, like, CIA' that year, so the claim's 'invited to a conference with the CIA' departs somewhat from the passage's wording.4 sources →

    ▶ 41:55

33. 33TrueIbram Kendi published a book titled Chain of Ideas on Great Replacement Theory.Multiple sources show Ibram X. Kendi's book 'Chain of Ideas: The Origins of Our Authoritarian Age' (Penguin Random House, March 2026) is a global history of great replacement theory, so the claim is supported; the extracted title omits the subtitle, a faithful shortening. The claim was made on 2026-09-23, and the book was already published by then, so it was true on that date.5 sources →

    ▶ 43:58

34. 34FalseJason Stanley left Twitter immediately after Elon Musk purchased the platform.The extraction faithfully reflects the post, which says Stanley left the instant Musk bought Twitter. A Tech Xplore/AFP report from Oct 28, 2022, the day after the deal closed on Oct 27, quotes Stanley saying 'For the moment I am staying on Twitter,' which contradicts an immediate departure. Sources confirm he wrote about Musk's takeover in Project Syndicate but do not establish when he left the platform.5 sources →

    ▶ 45:55

35. 35TrueRussia employed social media to suppress voter turnout in the 2016 election by attacking Hillary Clinton as a racist.Multiple tier1 and tier2 sources document that the Russian Internet Research Agency used social media in 2016 to discourage Black voters from voting and to denigrate Hillary Clinton, which supports the core claim of voter-turnout suppression. The sources do not use the specific phrase 'attacking Clinton as a racist', but they describe racially charged attacks on Clinton, so this detail is peripheral and uncontradicted.9 sources →

    ▶ 48:40

36. 36TrueRod Dreher attacked Jason Stanley on social media in 2015 or 2016.Sources show Rod Dreher publicly attacked Jason Stanley in September 2016, in a post mocking Stanley's comment about Swinburne, which fits the claimed 2016 timeframe. The attack appeared on a blog rather than explicitly on social media, and the sources do not say whether 2015 was also involved, so the 'social media' detail is only loosely supported.2 sources →

    ▶ 50:10

37. 37TrueJason Stanley was a professor at Yale University for 12 years.Sources show Jason Stanley joined Yale as a professor of philosophy in 2013 and left in 2025, and CNN explicitly says he had spent 12 years teaching there, so the claim that he was a Yale professor for 12 years is supported. The claim faithfully paraphrases the passage's 'a dozen years' at Yale.6 sources →

    ▶ 53:41

38. 38TrueJason Stanley was a member of the Yale faculty senate.Yale FAS-SEAS Senate committee listings for 2023-24 name Jason Stanley as a member of the Faculty Advancement and Budget Committees, which indicates he sat within the Yale faculty senate structure. The claim is faithful to the passage, and the sources show Stanley was a Yale faculty member from 2013 to 2025, but no source directly states he was a senator, so confidence is moderate.3 sources →

    ▶ 53:47

39. 39TrueJason Stanley published a book in formal semantics and philosophy of language in 2023.Jason Stanley co-authored The Politics of Language with David Beaver, published by Princeton University Press in November 2023 (US date Nov 7, 2023), and it is a work on the theory of meaning and philosophy of language. The claim's book, year, and subject match the sources; the book is co-authored, which the claim does not contradict.3 sources →

    ▶ 58:57

40. 40TrueAdam Tooze described Jason Stanley's move to Canada as the worst possible decision politically and ethically.Stanley's own substack reply quotes Tooze calling the move "absolutely the wrong decision in every respect: it's wrong politically, it's wrong ethically," which closely matches the claim's core characterization. The source is Stanley's rebuttal rather than the original Guardian profile, and the wording "worst possible" is a paraphrase, so confidence is moderate.4 sources →

    ▶ 59:51

41. 41MixedCanada had 4,000 enslaved people over two centuries.Historian Marcel Trudel's count of about 4,185-4,200 enslaved people in New France/Quebec, roughly 1671-1834, is close to the claimed 4,000, and the extraction faithfully reflects the post. However, the sources dispute the total: a historian quoted by HuffPost says the figure was 'many, many more thousands,' and the Aristotle Foundation estimates 7,000-7,500 across the period, so the claim sits at the low end of competing estimates.8 sources →

    ▶ 1:02:25

42. 42TrueThe United States had 4 million enslaved people at the dawn of the Civil War.The claim matches the record: the 1860 census counted about 3.95 million enslaved people in the United States, which rounds to 4 million on the eve of the Civil War. The extracted claim faithfully reflects the passage, and the rounding is within the record's range.5 sources →

    ▶ 1:02:32

43. 43Can’t tellElon Musk purchased Twitter because he viewed it as a threat to his power.The claim is a motive attribution that the passage offers as the speaker's own inference ('obviously... would not have purchased... if he didn't view it as a threat'), and the extraction drops that hedge. None of the sources address whether Musk bought Twitter to protect his power; they report his stated reasons (free speech, a 'digital town square', fighting bots) and other explanations, such as payments, so the claim cannot be graded either way.7 sources →

    ▶ 1:07:06

44. 44Can’t tellTech billionaires want to replace humanity with AI and render the vast majority of humans superfluous.The extraction faithfully reflects Jason Stanley's post, but the claim is a sweeping characterization of billionaires' motives. Sources quote some tech leaders describing human-machine merger or humans as a 'biological bootloader', yet none establishes that tech billionaires as a group want to replace humanity or render the vast majority superfluous, so the claim is not checkable as stated. The claim was made on 2026-09-23, and the sources published around that date do not change this assessment.7 sources →

    ▶ 1:08:30

45. 45Can’t tellBillionaires are engineering a replacement of humanity by AI agents.The sources show that some tech billionaires and commentators describe a future in which AI could supplant or replace humanity, and that some leaders openly welcome this. None establishes that billionaires are deliberately engineering a replacement of humanity by AI agents; that is a sweeping political characterization rather than a checkable factual claim. The claim also reflects the post's framing, which is unsupported by the sources as a documented plan.8 sources →

    ▶ 1:09:56

46. 46Can’t tellElon Musk and Peter Thiel want to kill all humans.The claim departs from the passage: the speaker says it is hard for him to imagine Musk and Thiel wanting to wipe out humanity, calling it 'entirely possible' without asserting it. None of the sources shows either man wanting to kill all humans, and the sources that address Thiel's views on AI doom describe risk debates, not intent to kill.6 sources →

    ▶ 1:14:01

47. 47TruePeter Thiel hesitated when asked by Ross Douthat if humanity should survive.Multiple independent sources quote the Douthat interview transcript, in which Douthat says 'You're hesitating' and 'This is a long hesitation!' before Thiel answers whether the human race should survive. The claim matches the passage's referent (the 'Dowdat' misspelling resolves to Douthat), and no source contradicts it.7 sources →

    ▶ 1:14:29

48. 48TrueJason Stanley wrote an article for The New York Times in 2011 titled "Ways of Silencing" about the birtherism conspiracy theory.The New York Times Opinionator published Jason Stanley's "The Ways of Silencing" on June 25, 2011, and it discusses outlandish claims that President Obama was born in Kenya, which is birtherism. NBC News and Truthout independently describe his 2011 Times piece as concerning birtherism or propaganda about Obama. The claim's "very first" framing from the post is not carried into the extracted claim, so it is not graded.6 sources →

    ▶ 1:18:11

49. 49Can’t tellDonald Trump spread the article "Ways of Silencing" written by Jason Stanley.The claim departs from the passage: the post says Trump spread the thing the piece was about (the birtherism conspiracy theory, which the speaker says the 2011 article addressed), not the article itself. No source states that Trump spread Stanley's article "The Ways of Silencing," though the NYT article [2] discusses outlandish claims about Obama's birth and the post's own context supports the birtherism reading.3 sources →

    ▶ 1:18:19

50. 50TrueJason Stanley published a 500-page book and a 350-page book on propaganda and philosophy of language while working as a public intellectual.Sources confirm Stanley wrote a propaganda book (How Propaganda Works, 2015) with page counts of roughly 353 to 376, and a philosophy-of-language book (The Politics of Language, 2023) of 520 pages, close to the claimed 350 and 500. The 'while working as a public intellectual' timing is not directly tested by the sources, but his public writing and books overlap in the period, and the page counts are approximate rather than contradicted.8 sources →

    ▶ 1:22:26

51. 51TrueJason Stanley's 2005 book on epistemology argued that practical political and moral interests impact the search for knowledge.The 2005 book Knowledge and Practical Interests by Jason Stanley is confirmed by multiple sources (Oxford Academic, Philopedia, Google Books) as arguing that whether a true belief counts as knowledge is partly determined by practical interests, i.e., what is at stake for the person, which matches the claim's core assertion that practical interests impact the search for knowledge. The claim's 'political and moral' wording is a paraphrase of the post's own words and is not separately contradicted; the sources describe stakes generally rather than political/moral specifically, a minor imprecision.5 sources →

    ▶ 1:23:18

52. 52TrueDonald Trump has directed threats against the Democratic Party and states that vote Democratic.The sources support the claim's core: Trump has threatened to withhold federal help from states that elect Democrats and has attacked Democratic candidates and Democratic-run cities, with the AP's October 2026 reporting on rally threats as the most direct evidence. The post says 'the Democrats' and the extraction's 'Democratic Party' is a faithful paraphrase, and the claim's wording is consistent with the record as of 2026-09-23, though the most direct AP coverage post-dates the claim.4 sources →

    ▶ 4:14

53. 53TrueDonald Trump has enriched himself at the state till using the presidency.Sources document that Trump's reported income and wealth rose sharply during his presidency, including $2.2 billion in 2025 income versus $622 million in 2024, and that foreign payments and crypto ventures tied to him grew while he was in office. Whether this amounts to enrichment 'using the presidency' is an interpretation the White House disputes, and the claim's 'state till' phrasing is rhetorical, so confidence is moderate.5 sources →

    ▶ 9:13

54. 54MixedHillary Clinton's super predator remark was used in the 2016 election to suppress the anti-Trump vote.Multiple reports say the Trump campaign used Clinton's super-predator remark in targeted ads meant to discourage Black and Clinton-leaning voters, so the remark was used in 2016 to try to keep people from voting for her. The claim is contested on two points: Reason and CNBC describe the tactics as persuasive advertising rather than suppression, and none of the sources confirm the post's implied Russian use of the remark.8 sources →

    ▶ 39:34

55. 55TrueRichard Swinburne described homosexuality as a disability in a talk.Multiple sources report that Richard Swinburne, in a keynote at the 2016 Midwest Society of Christian Philosophers meeting, called homosexuality a "disability" and an "incurable condition"; the APA committee and Inside Higher Ed both report it, and the Society's president later disavowed the remarks. The post's reference to a "philosopher" resolves to Swinburne's talk, so the extracted claim is faithful to the passage.6 sources →

    ▶ 50:20

What it’s built on

• DistrustCalls the government illegitimateattacks on democratic institutions, like the press, and universities, and the courtsdestruction of a democratic platformMusk was using his takeover of Twitter to attack the epistemic foundations of democracy

Sources

Related posts

• Letters from an American · Oct 27, 2026October 26, 2026 Trump posted his longest-ever social media post last night, Giant turnout for rallies by Obama illustrate the changing mood of the country, Images of the packed venues for Obama, compared to the dwindling crowds for Trump, circulated on social  media, Trump’s detSays something close: Donald Trump promised to pay Americans 5,000 dollars if Republicans win the midterms.2 mixed2 can’t tell22 true
• Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar · Oct 27, 2026Krystal and Saagar discuss Anthropic reveals major losses in IPO report, feds prep election doomsday if GOP loses. Trita Parsi: https://tritaparsi.substack.com/ Logan Phillips: https://www.racetothewh.com/ To become a Breaking Points Premium Member and watch/listen to the showSays something close: Donald Trump will say the 2026 midterm election was rigged.2 mixed6 can’t tell28 true
• Deadline: White House · Oct 22, 2026October 22, 2026; 4pm: With the midterms just less than two weeks away, our democracy and election integrity is being put to the test as some Democrats are preparing for Trump and his administration to allege foreign meddling and fraud in order to justify election interference. Says something close: Donald Trump and his administration are undermining the midterm elections and mounting a brazen assault on election integrity.2 false4 mixed9 can’t tell27 true
• Badlands Media · Oct 15, 2026President Trump rallies Bullhead City, Arizona, 20 days out from the midterms, walking on to "God Bless the USA" and opening with Air Force One and life on the road. He goes after Governor Katie Hobbs again and again, from the border and the cartels to the cognitive test he saysSays something close: If Republicans win the House of Representatives and the Senate in the midterms, Donald Trump will give 5000 dollars to every adult citizen in the United States.31 false24 mixed18 can’t tell35 true
• The Bulwark Daily · Sep 29, 2026Vigilance is still in order, but Trump’s efforts to rig the midterms have so far flopped. And that includes Trump’s self-sabotaging of his own plan to blame China for hacking our voting machines. But should the Dems win back Congress, they’re going to be busy tracing all the moneSays something close: Donald Trump attempted to rig the 2026 midterm elections.1 false7 mixed9 can’t tell46 true
• The Ebro, Laura, Rosenberg Show · Sep 12, 2026ELR News w/ Kevin Ortega-Rojas is a progressive news show breaking down the biggest news stories impacting our communities weekly on YouTube Fridays at 10AM EST. Hosted by Kevin Ortega-Rojas & Laura Stylez. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoicesSays something close: Donald Trump promised to give every voter $5,000 if Republicans win the midterms.1 false9 mixed4 can’t tell23 true
• Deadline: White House · Sep 7, 2026September 4, 2026, 4pm; Now even as Americans start casting their ballots, Trump refuses to give up on his effort to suppress the vote. For more from Nicolle, follow and download her podcast, “The Best People with Nicolle Wallace,” wherever you get your podcasts. To listen to tSays something close: The Trump administration is planning to seize ballots and make fraud claims after the midterms to justify interference.3 false6 mixed2 can’t tell32 true
• IHIP News · Sep 20, 2026Is Trump gearing up for a second insurrection attempt? Pre-order Jennifer’s new book Not Today, Fascists today: https://linktr.ee/ivehaditpodcast Follow Us: I've Had It Podcast: @Ivehaditpodcast Jennifer Welch: @mizzwelch Josh Welch: @joshwelch_ Learn more about your ad choSays something close: The Supreme Court ruled against the Trump administration's request for new mail-in voting restrictions.3 mixed1 can’t tell19 true