The campaign for Proposition 133, 134, and 135 is filing charges through the City of Aurora for the theft of campaign signs.
Posted by Bannon`s War Room, Checked
- Sources
- 5 context
- Said
- 1 time·
- Confidence
- 20%
Bannon`s War RoomOct 28, 2026
None of the provided sources covers the alleged sign-theft incident or any campaign filing of charges through the City of Aurora, so the claim cannot be graded. The extraction is faithful to the post, which names the Props 133-135 campaign, Aurora, and the stealing of campaign signs, so no addition is at issue.
The guest relays this claim without endorsing it. It counts as passed on, not against the post.
This claim is about the present, so it is judged as of the day it was checked.
What was said
… Look at that freak. We're gonna play this again tomorrow. I don't have time now. We're gonna get you back on tomorrow. Look at the evil that just emanates from him. Okay, look at that. You caught him red-handed. Is he getting arrested, sir? Yeah, so, so the initiative, the campaign is filing charges through Aurora. The crimes actually occurred in Aurora. We, when we confronted him, we were outside of that jurisdiction. So the police that came out, one of the, well, actually, a local guy who saw what was going on came up, freaked out about us, started screaming at us, called the cops. …
Bannon`s War Room · · from the transcriptPost →What we found
Context. The claimant's own passage says the campaign is filing charges through Aurora for theft of campaign signs, but the passage itself is not evidence for the claim.
Context. The sources that mention Props 133-135 (such as the Kim Monson Show ballot-measure page) describe what the measures do and say nothing about a sign-theft incident or charges filed by the campaign.[1]
Context. The Aurora-related sources (the Aurora police news page and the Colorado Politics retail-theft story) concern unrelated crimes, and the 2020 Denver Post and AP coverage concerns protest-related sign theft charges from 2020, not 2026.[2][3][4][5]
Context. The event is recent (posted 2026-10-28, checked 2026-11-02) and no source published after it covers it, so coverage has not caught up. Nothing in the sources contradicts the claim.
Sources
5 sources: 5 not rated
- 12026 Ballot Measures | The Kim Monson Showkimmonson.com · not rated · cited for: context
- 2APD News - City of Auroraauroragov.org · not rated · cited for: context
- 3aurora theft Archivescoloradopolitics.com · not rated · cited for: context
- 4Protesters, demonstration leaders arrested in connection to rallies in ...denverpost.com · not rated · cited for: context
- 5Crowd protests charges against Denver anti-racism leadersseattletimes.com · not rated · cited for: context
Where this claim was made
Said in 1 published post
Related claims
- Campaign signs for Proposition 133, 134, and 135 have been stolen across Colorado.Can’t tell
- Colorado initiatives 133, 134, and 135 are on the statewide ballot to protect children.True
- The Protect Kids Colorado initiatives on the November ballot are numbered 133, 134, and 135.True
- Eight campaign signs were recovered after a confrontation with an individual.Can’t tell
- Signs supporting ballot initiatives were removed from the property of St. Francis Cabrini Catholic Church in Littleton, Colorado.Can’t tell