Pfizer 5.3.6 post-market data noted an 81% miscarriage rate.
Posted by Badlands Media, Checked
- Sources
- 4 contradict3 support
- Said
- 1 time·
- Confidence
- 60%
Badlands MediaAug 11, 2026
Literally, the Pfizer 5.3.6 document is a real FDA submission that contains an 81% figure, which fact-checkers trace to miscalculated percentages from 32 pregnancy cases with most outcomes unreported. Read as a real 81% miscarriage rate, the claim is false: fact-checkers say no study found such a rate and the figure is a miscalculation.
The host relays this claim without endorsing it. It counts as passed on, not against the post.
What was said
… Quote, the authors claimed a miscarriage rate of 12.6%. That alone should be enough to not give this, this jab to pregnant women. However, the raw data revealed an 82% miscarriage rate in women vaccinated during the first trimester. This is consistent with 81% miscarriage rate noted in the Pfizer 5.3.6 post-market data. These figures mirror the effects of chemical abortion drugs such as RU 486. Remember, thank you, Kiphan, I got it. …
Badlands Media · · from the transcriptPost →What we found
Contradicts. Lead Stories rates the 81% and 82% figures as miscalculated from early, incomplete data, and says no study actually found such miscarriage rates. The 5.3.6 figure is a separate source, and most of its pregnancies had no reported outcome.[1][5][6]
Contradicts. FactCheck.org and the CDC-linked V-safe and NEJM data show miscarriage rates near the normal 10–20% background, around 12.6%, not 81%.[1][2]
Supports. Thorp's testimony and expert report state that Pfizer's 5.3.6 post-market analysis, page 12, reports an 81% miscarriage rate (26 of 32 cases, with 238 of 270 lacking follow-up).[4][7]
Supports. Reuters confirms the 5.3.6 document is a genuine Pfizer-BioNTech submission to the FDA covering adverse event reports through February 28, 2021, so the 81% figure has a real documentary origin.[3]
Context. The claim's intended meaning, that the 5.3.6 data reveals a true 81% miscarriage rate, is rejected by fact-checkers, so the literal and intended readings receive different verdicts.[1][6]
Sources
7 sources: 3 fact-checkers, 1 primary, 3 not rated
- 1Fact Check: Studies Do NOT Show an 81% or 82% Miscarriage ...leadstories.com · fact-checker · cited for: contradicts, context
- 2COVID-19 Vaccination Doesn’t Increase Miscarriage Risk, Contrary to Naomi Wolf's Spurious Stat - FactCheck.orgfactcheck.org · fact-checker · cited for: contradicts
- 3Fact Check: Pfizer FDA document does not show COVID shot ...reuters.com · fact-checker · cited for: supports
- 4[PDF] COVID-19 Vaccinations and Pregnancy Outcomes James A Thorp ...hsgac.senate.gov · primary source · cited for: supports
- 5Fact Check: Studies Do NOT Show an 81% or 82% Miscarriage Rate in Women Vaccinated Against COVID-19 in First Trimesterhealth.yahoo.com · not rated · cited for: contradicts
- 6Fact Check: No Evidence COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines ...trial.medpath.com · not rated · cited for: contradicts, context
- 71doakshirreff.com · not rated · cited for: supports
Where this claim was made
Said in 1 published post
Related claims
- Raw data revealed an 82% miscarriage rate in women vaccinated during the first trimester.False
- A study on COVID-19 vaccination during the first trimester of pregnancy revealed an 82% miscarriage rate.False
- Anthony Fauci knew that pregnant women had a higher rate of miscarriage from taking the COVID-19 vaccine.False
- A shot given to pregnant women had an 82% miscarriage rate.False
- Senators Ron Johnson and Rand Paul released documents claiming a 12.6% miscarriage rate for pregnant women who received the COVID-19 vaccine.Can’t tell