Badlands Media

Badlands Media features the work of a dedicated group of Patriot citizen journalists who are changing the media landscape in America. Badlands Media shows are originally broadcast LIVE on Rumble.com/BadlandsMedia.

Watch this show

349 claims

True65% confidence8 sourcesSep 16, 2026River offers a 3.3% interest rate on cash deposits paid in bitcoin.Said by 5DRiver's own materials and a third-party aggregator both state that cash on River earns 3.3% APY paid in bitcoin, matching the claim as of the 2026-09-16 post date. The sources are mostly River's own marketing and are not independent of the company, and the rate is stated as subject to change.True90% confidence5 sourcesSep 16, 2026The President issued an internal directive five months ago mandating that the USPS initiate a proposed rulemaking regarding election ballot mail.Said by BThe claim matches the Supreme Court's September 14, 2026 opinion in Postal Service v. California, which says that some five months earlier the President issued an 'internal directive' to his subordinates mandating that the USPS initiate a proposed rulemaking on election ballot mail. The EO 14399 text and the Federal Register confirm that the March 31, 2026 order directed USPS rulemaking, so the claim is supported, with 'internal' being the Court's characterization of a publicly issued order.Reported in the post, not stated as its own.True92% confidence7 sourcesSep 16, 2026Numerous organizations and a group of states led by California sued in the District of Massachusetts following the President's directive on election ballot mail.Said by BThe claim matches the Supreme Court's own description in the 26A305 stay order: days after the President's directive, numerous organizations and a group of states led by California sued in the District of Massachusetts. Other sources confirm the Massachusetts venue and the California-led states coalition, so the claim is supported and the extraction faithfully reflects the passage.Reported in the post, not stated as its own.True93% confidence6 sourcesSep 16, 2026In late August, the Postal Service promulgated a final rule requiring federal ballot mail to be sent in envelopes with an election mail logo, high-speed processing compatibility, and a unique voter barcode.Said by 5CThe Postal Service's final rule "Ballot Mail for Federal Elections" was issued in late August 2026 (dated Aug 21 and published Aug 26) and requires federal ballot envelopes to bear the official Election Mail logo, be automation compatible (the claim's "high-speed processing"), and carry a unique voter IMb barcode. The rule's implementation is blocked by court injunctions, which the summary should note, but the claim is about promulgation and the requirements, which the sources confirm.Reported in the post, not stated as its own.True65% confidence3 sourcesSep 16, 2026Free Speech for People engages in litigation in Massachusetts.The sources show Free Speech For People engaged in litigation in Massachusetts: a federal docket lists it as plaintiff in a Massachusetts district court FOIA suit, and its own site describes amicus work in Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Healey and a Massachusetts campaign-finance case. The docket was filed October 1, 2026, after the September 16 posting date, and the organization's site is self-description, so the evidence is thin, though it points one way. The claim is a faithful paraphrase of the post's passage.True80% confidence5 sourcesSep 16, 2026Congress exempted the exercise of the powers of the Postal Service from review under the Administrative Procedure Act.Said by 5CThe claim matches the statutory text of 39 U.S.C. §410(a), which the primary Supreme Court source (Alito dissent in Postal Service v. California) quotes as exempting "the exercise of the powers of the Postal Service" from review under the APA. Courts disagree on how broad that exemption is (Peoples Gas limits it to procurement-type operations), but the claim's core assertion about what Congress enacted is supported.Reported in the post, not stated as its own.True90% confidence5 sourcesSep 16, 2026The Postal Service is exempt from review under the Administrative Procedure Act.Said by 5CThe Supreme Court's 2026 order in USPS v. California (source 4) states that Congress broadly exempted the Postal Service's exercise of powers from APA review under 39 U.S.C. §410(a), and an opinion quoted in Edens (source 9) says the Postal Service 'is exempt from review under the Administrative Procedure Act.' The claim as extracted matches the passage's own wording, and nothing in the sources contradicts it; note that Air Courier (source 8) and a 2023 district court opinion (source 7) say the exemption may extend only partly to APA review, so it is a nuanced rather than absolute exemption, but the core assertion holds on the standard reading.Reported in the post, not stated as its own.True90% confidence6 sourcesSep 16, 2026A federal district judge issued a nationwide injunction against the Postal Service regarding ballot mail regulations.Federal District Judge Indira Talwani issued a nationwide preliminary injunction against the Postal Service's mail-ballot implementation on August 11, 2026, as the court order and several outlets report. The extraction is a faithful paraphrase of the post's reference to the judge's nationwide injunction; the later lifting of that injunction by the Supreme Court does not make the issuance claim false.True80% confidence3 sourcesSep 16, 2026A district judge expanded an injunction from 23 states to all 50 states.Said by 5CReuters reports that U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani on August 11, 2026 expanded her June injunction from 23 mostly Democratic-led states to nationwide, and other outlets report the same expansion to all 50 states. The extracted claim matches the passage's wording, and the 'she' in the post resolves to Talwani.True90% confidence5 sourcesSep 16, 2026Justice Kavanaugh joined the concurrence in the Supreme Court mail-in ballot order.Said by 5CMultiple tier1 and independent sources (AP, Reuters, SCOTUSblog, CNBC, Deseret) report that Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a concurrence in the Supreme Court's September 2026 unsigned order denying the Trump administration's mail-in ballot rule request, with only Alito and Thomas dissenting. The post's 'Kavanagh' is the same justice, and the claim's 'joined the concurrence' is a faithful paraphrase; sources say he wrote a separate concurrence rather than merely joining, a detail that does not change the core assertion.True95% confidence5 sourcesSep 16, 2026Justice Thomas joined Justice Alito's dissent in the Supreme Court mail-in ballot order.Multiple tier1 and tier2 sources (Reuters, NYT, NPR, PBS, AP) report that Justices Alito and Thomas dissented from the Supreme Court's September 14, 2026 unsigned order declining to let the USPS enforce Trump's mail-in ballot rule, so Thomas joined Alito's dissent. The extraction faithfully reflects the post, which says Thomas joined the dissent of Alito's mail ballot ruling; the post's reference to Alito's dissent is consistent with sources.True85% confidence6 sourcesSep 16, 2026The Department of Justice has a record of zero wins in 23 voter-data cases.Multiple sources report that the DOJ has lost all 23 of its decided voter-roll cases and won none, which matches the claim's 'zero wins in 23' framing. The claim is faithful to the passage, and the sources were published after the post date.

The Readout