Badlands Media

Badlands Media features the work of a dedicated group of Patriot citizen journalists who are changing the media landscape in America. Badlands Media shows are originally broadcast LIVE on Rumble.com/BadlandsMedia.

Watch this show

166 claims · Clear filters

True88% confidence5 sourcesSep 16, 2026The administration sent monitors to elections in 2025.Said by CThe claim is supported: the DOJ announced in October 2025 that it would monitor polling sites in California and New Jersey for the November 4, 2025 election, and PolitiFact, CNN, and WDSU reported the monitors being deployed. The claim matches the post's wording, which refers to this administration sending monitors in 2025.True95% confidence5 sourcesSep 16, 2026The California primary election took place on June 2nd.Said by CMultiple primary and official sources (California Secretary of State, San Francisco government, AP, and a recap piece) confirm the California statewide primary was held on June 2, 2026. The extracted claim is a faithful paraphrase of the passage's reference to the June 2nd primary, and no source contradicts the date.True92% confidence5 sourcesSep 16, 2026Attorneys from the U.S. Attorney's Office in Los Angeles visited the Los Angeles County vote counting center following the June 2nd primary.Said by CAn Assistant U.S. Attorney from the U.S. Attorney's Office in Los Angeles visited the Los Angeles County Ballot Processing Center on June 5, 2026, after the June 2 primary, as confirmed by the county's own report and by AP and CNN. The sources describe one attorney rather than several, a minor imprecision that does not change the core claim.True55% confidence5 sourcesSep 16, 2026One woman pled guilty in relation to the California primary election.Said by 5CLiterally, the claim is supported: Orange County DA source [4] reports a Costa Mesa woman pled guilty to a misdemeanor for voting her dog in the 2022 California primary, and Brenda Lee Brown Armstrong pled guilty in June 2026 to a federal voter-registration payment count. However, the sources do not tie any guilty plea to the June 2026 primary itself; Armstrong's plea concerns paid petition circulation for ballot measures, so the post's intended 2026-primary reading is only loosely supported.True65% confidence10 sourcesSep 16, 2026Bitcoin is trading at 75,000 dollars.Said by 5COn 2026-09-16, multiple same-day sources put Bitcoin at roughly $75,600 to $76,000, with a 24-hour low near $74,945, so "trading at 75,000" is a close rounded figure. The post's "down to 75,000" was said that day and the extraction matches it; later prices (about $68,000 to $78,000 in late October and early November) do not bear on the September 16 date.True60% confidence9 sourcesSep 16, 2026Human bodies produce one to 2% less collagen every year after age 30.Said by BMultiple sources state that collagen declines after age 30 at roughly 1% to 1.5% per year, and one states 1 or 2% per year, so the claimed 1-2% range overlaps the reported figures. The sources are low-credibility commercial and blog pages with no authoritative source directly addressing this figure, and the post's wording is faithfully extracted.True65% confidence8 sourcesSep 16, 2026River offers a 3.3% interest rate on cash deposits paid in bitcoin.Said by 5DRiver's own materials and a third-party aggregator both state that cash on River earns 3.3% APY paid in bitcoin, matching the claim as of the 2026-09-16 post date. The sources are mostly River's own marketing and are not independent of the company, and the rate is stated as subject to change.True90% confidence5 sourcesSep 16, 2026The President issued an internal directive five months ago mandating that the USPS initiate a proposed rulemaking regarding election ballot mail.Said by BThe claim matches the Supreme Court's September 14, 2026 opinion in Postal Service v. California, which says that some five months earlier the President issued an 'internal directive' to his subordinates mandating that the USPS initiate a proposed rulemaking on election ballot mail. The EO 14399 text and the Federal Register confirm that the March 31, 2026 order directed USPS rulemaking, so the claim is supported, with 'internal' being the Court's characterization of a publicly issued order.Reported in the post, not stated as its own.True92% confidence7 sourcesSep 16, 2026Numerous organizations and a group of states led by California sued in the District of Massachusetts following the President's directive on election ballot mail.Said by BThe claim matches the Supreme Court's own description in the 26A305 stay order: days after the President's directive, numerous organizations and a group of states led by California sued in the District of Massachusetts. Other sources confirm the Massachusetts venue and the California-led states coalition, so the claim is supported and the extraction faithfully reflects the passage.Reported in the post, not stated as its own.True93% confidence6 sourcesSep 16, 2026In late August, the Postal Service promulgated a final rule requiring federal ballot mail to be sent in envelopes with an election mail logo, high-speed processing compatibility, and a unique voter barcode.Said by 5CThe Postal Service's final rule "Ballot Mail for Federal Elections" was issued in late August 2026 (dated Aug 21 and published Aug 26) and requires federal ballot envelopes to bear the official Election Mail logo, be automation compatible (the claim's "high-speed processing"), and carry a unique voter IMb barcode. The rule's implementation is blocked by court injunctions, which the summary should note, but the claim is about promulgation and the requirements, which the sources confirm.Reported in the post, not stated as its own.True65% confidence3 sourcesSep 16, 2026Free Speech for People engages in litigation in Massachusetts.The sources show Free Speech For People engaged in litigation in Massachusetts: a federal docket lists it as plaintiff in a Massachusetts district court FOIA suit, and its own site describes amicus work in Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Healey and a Massachusetts campaign-finance case. The docket was filed October 1, 2026, after the September 16 posting date, and the organization's site is self-description, so the evidence is thin, though it points one way. The claim is a faithful paraphrase of the post's passage.True80% confidence5 sourcesSep 16, 2026Congress exempted the exercise of the powers of the Postal Service from review under the Administrative Procedure Act.Said by 5CThe claim matches the statutory text of 39 U.S.C. §410(a), which the primary Supreme Court source (Alito dissent in Postal Service v. California) quotes as exempting "the exercise of the powers of the Postal Service" from review under the APA. Courts disagree on how broad that exemption is (Peoples Gas limits it to procurement-type operations), but the claim's core assertion about what Congress enacted is supported.Reported in the post, not stated as its own.

The Readout