Transporting or possessing a force reset trigger in New York is a Class E felony, carrying a prison sentence of one to four years or a financial fine of 5,000 dollars.
Posted by Unsubscribe Podcast, Checked
- Sources
- 1 contradict8 context
- Said
- 1 time·
- Confidence
- 40%
Unsubscribe PodcastSep 13, 2026
No source mentions force reset triggers, so the sources cannot directly confirm or refute the claim's Class E felony classification. The nearest provision, NY Penal Law 265.01-C on rapid-fire modification devices, is a class A misdemeanor, which points against the claim, but the sources do not establish that a force reset trigger falls under that statute.
This claim is about the present, so it is judged as of the day it was checked.
What was said
… Uh, uh, cheeky bastard. Cheeky bastard. He's the cheeky bastard, dude. Ah, well, okay. Um, all right. Well, I'm getting two different things from Google AI because it's shit. This one is saying transporting or possessing a force reset trigger in New York is a Class E felony, carrying a prison sentence of one to four years. That's worse. SE felony, yeah. That's weird, but why? What is the pro i wonder what the case lies? Focal claws? Yeah, I'll have to look that up. Or a financial fine of 5000 dollars. That's an expensive trip. Yeah, but then you're a convicted felon. Yeah, no, I was gonna say I'd take the 5000 over four years in fucking prison. Oh, could be fun. JD. Vance came up. Great JD. Delay. Like, I'm learning new things about our vice president. …
Unsubscribe Podcast · · from the transcriptPost →What we found
Contradicts. NY Penal Law 265.01-C states that criminal possession of a rapid-fire modification device is a class A misdemeanor, which runs against the claimed Class E felony if force reset triggers fall under that statute.[5]
Context. None of the provided sources mention force reset triggers, so the claim's specific referent is not addressed directly.[3][4][5][6][7][8][9]
Context. The general felony fine rule in New York is the higher of $5,000 or double the gain, which is consistent with the claim's $5,000 fine figure but does not confirm the offense classification.[9]
Context. The sources on the Class E felony class describe other offenses such as falsifying business records in the first degree, so they concern a different referent and do not address the claim.[1][2]
Sources
9 sources: 2 fact-checkers, 2 primary, 5 not rated
- 1Fact-checking Trump's speech at Trump Tower after New York ...politifact.com · fact-checker · cited for: context
- 2Posts Distort Possible Sentencing for Trump in Manhattan Indictment - FactCheck.orgfactcheck.org · fact-checker · cited for: context
- 3CHAPTER 1030 AN ACT providing for the punishment of offenses ...legislation.nysenate.gov · primary source · cited for: context
- 4Sentence of Imprisonment for a Violent Felony Offensenysenate.gov · primary source · cited for: context
- 5N.Y. Penal Law Section 265.01-C – Criminal possession of a rapid ...newyork.public.law · not rated · cited for: contradicts, context
- 6New York Penal Law § 70.00 (2025) - Sentence of Imprisonment ...law.justia.com · not rated · cited for: context
- 7New York Consolidated Laws, Penal Law - PEN § 110.05codes.findlaw.com · not rated · cited for: context
- 8Bill Search and Legislative Informationassembly.state.ny.us · not rated · cited for: context
- 9New York Felony Classes and Misdemeanor Penalties (2026)recordinglaw.com · not rated · cited for: context
Where this claim was made
Said in 1 published post