Polygraph

It was stipulated in legal precedent that there were no gas chambers at Ravensbrück.

Posted by The Pete Quiñones Show, Checked

Polygraph verdictFalse
Sources
5 contradict1 context
Said
1 time·
Confidence
80%
The Pete Quiñones ShowOct 10, 2026
View on Podcast ↗
Video frame
147 claimsThe check →

The claim that legal precedent stipulated there were no gas chambers at Ravensbrück is contradicted by multiple sources documenting a gas chamber built at the camp in early 1945 and used to kill prisoners.

What was said

… And this testimony was contradictory relative to the factual record, witnesses were contradicting each other. There were people testifying about things such as gas chambers at, uh, Ravensbrook or Dachau and even then, even within the narratives that were extant and considered to be historical, as well as, um, legal precedent. It was, it was stipulated that, you know, there weren't gas chambers at Ravensbrook and things. Obviously two, there's the white elephant in the room. If there's a, a witness declaring, I was a, I was I was a, I was a death camp inmate, and this is what Eichmann was directing, well, if you were a death camp inmate, how are you here? …
The Pete Quiñones Show · · from the transcriptPost →

What we found

Contradicts. The USHMM Holocaust Encyclopedia describes Ravensbrück's killings, and the ABC and Holocaust Explained sources state that a gas chamber was built at or just outside the camp in 1945 and used to murder prisoners.[1][2][3]

Contradicts. A Canterbury Christ Church University thesis based on the postwar trial records states that a gas chamber was erected at Ravensbrück in March 1945 to speed up killings, and that the trial documents refer to the mass killings there.[4]

Contradicts. Wikipedia's entry on Ravensbrück lists one gas chamber at the camp and notes that an adjacent male camp built and managed the gas chambers in January 1945.[5]

Context. The Faurisson essay argued that the Ravensbrück and Mauthausen gas chambers did not exist, but it is a denialist text and does not reflect any legal finding or authoritative record.[6]

Sources

6 sources: 6 not rated

  1. 1Ravensbrück | Holocaust Encyclopediaencyclopedia.ushmm.org · not rated · cited for: contradicts
  2. 2Ravensbrück: Hitler's all-female World War II concentration ...abc.net.au · not rated · cited for: contradicts
  3. 3Conditions inside – The Holocaust Explained: Designed for schoolstheholocaustexplained.org · not rated · cited for: contradicts
  4. 4Canterbury Christ Church University’s repository of research outputsrepository.canterbury.ac.uk · not rated · cited for: contradicts
  5. 5Ravensbrück concentration camp - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org · not rated · cited for: contradicts
  6. 6FAURISSON: The problem of the 'gas chambers' (1978)ia600603.us.archive.org · not rated · cited for: context

Where this claim was made

Said in 1 published post

How Polygraph checks a claim

Our Weekly Newsletter

The Readout

The week's most-shared posts, checked. What they claimed, how they argued, and what held up.

Unsubscribe any time. See our privacy policy.