The Supreme Court stayed a preliminary injunction in the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition case on September 28 or 29 of last year, allowing a pocket rescission to go forward.
Posted by The Lawfare Podcast, Checked
- Sources
- 4 contradict2 context
- Said
- 1 time·
- Confidence
- 70%
The Lawfare PodcastOct 8, 2026
The core claim holds: the Supreme Court stayed the preliminary injunction in the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition case in 2025, allowing the pocket rescission of about $4 billion to proceed. However, the sources date the stay to September 26, 2025, not September 28 or 29 as the claim states.
Minor detail. The sources confirm the claim; only a minor detail differs, such as a name's spelling, a title's wording or a rounding.
What we found
Contradicts. Multiple sources, including the Supreme Court docket, give the stay date as September 26, 2025, not September 28 or 29 as the claim states.[3][4][5][6]
Supports. The Supreme Court granted the administration's stay application in the AVAC case, letting the government impound roughly $4 billion subject to a pocket rescission.[3][4][5][6]
Context. The earlier September 9 action was only an administrative partial stay by Chief Justice Roberts, not the decision that let the pocket rescission go forward.[1][3]
Context. The pocket rescission concept itself is described in the AP report of August 29, 2025, which reports the first use of the maneuver in nearly 50 years.[2]
Sources
6 sources: 2 fact-checkers, 1 primary, 3 not rated
- 1US Supreme Court pauses judge's order that Trump spend foreign aidreuters.com · fact-checker · cited for: context
- 2Trump blocks $4.9B in foreign aid Congress ...apnews.com · fact-checker · cited for: context
- 3No. 25A269 - Search - Supreme Court of the United Statessupremecourt.gov · primary source · cited for: contradicts, supports, context
- 4Fact Sheet: The Supreme Court's Decision in AIDS Vaccine ...citizen.org · not rated · cited for: contradicts, supports
- 5AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition v. U.S. Department of Statedemocracy2025.org · not rated · cited for: contradicts, supports
- 6Department of State v. AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org · not rated · cited for: contradicts, supports
Where this claim was made
Said in 1 published post
Related claims
- The Supreme Court's decision in the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition case last year involved foreign assistance funds.True
- The Supreme Court granted a stay of a district court ruling that had blocked the Trump administration's implementation of the modified SAVE database for voter verification.True
- Judge Giacob in the National Urban League case extended a deadline for a pocket rescission.True
- The Supreme Court granted a stay in a legal case regarding mail-in ballot restrictions.True
- The Supreme Court has an injunction blocking the USPS from implementing new rules.Mixed