The Trump administration's current term has seen a relaxation of censorship on major social media platforms due to threats from the FTC and the DOJ.
Posted by The Health Ranger Report, Checked
- Sources
- 1 contradict6 context
- Said
- 1 time·
- Confidence
- 35%
The Health Ranger ReportOct 22, 2026
None of the sources reports that major platforms relaxed their content moderation in 2025-2026, let alone that FTC or DOJ threats caused it.
This claim is about the present, so it is judged as of the day it was checked.
What was said
… So I strongly suggest that you shift to alternative platforms, because X is going to have extreme censorship, of course, Facebook, of course, LinkedIn, of course, YouTube, etc. They're gonna have massive new censorship once the Democrats regain more power. They've sort of relaxed their censorship under Trump this term only because of threats from the FTC and the DOJ. That's all gonna get reversed. They're gonna come after you. You need to get onto alternative platforms. That includes Rumble. That includes Brighton.com, you know, other video platforms as well. BitChute is out there. …
The Health Ranger Report · · from the transcriptPost →What we found
Contradicts. The AEI report says Trump officials allegedly used coercion and FTC investigatory power to push companies to remove content such as ICE-sighting apps, which runs against the claim that FTC and DOJ threats led platforms to relax censorship. This is a think-tank analysis about a different practice, so it is weak evidence.[6]
Context. The DOJ, Reuters and Hill sources report a March 2026 settlement barring the CDC, CISA and the Surgeon General's office from pressuring platforms to remove speech for 10 years, which concerns Biden-era conduct rather than platform relaxation under Trump.[1][3][7]
Context. Executive Order 14149 frames the policy goal as ending federal pressure on platforms to suppress speech, but it does not report any change in platform moderation practices.[4][5]
Context. The PolitiFact report on a visa policy targeting people the government calls 'complicit in censoring Americans' shows the administration pursuing anti-censorship measures against content moderators, not documenting platform relaxation.[2]
Sources
7 sources: 2 fact-checkers, 3 primary, 1 not rated, 1 tier 1
- 1US settles social media censorship case, bars agencies ... - Reutersreuters.com · fact-checker · cited for: context
- 2Trump visa policy chills free speech, lawyer for journalists ... - PolitiFactpolitifact.com · fact-checker · cited for: context
- 3Justice Department Settles Lawsuits Challenging Biden ...justice.gov · primary source · cited for: context
- 4DCPD202500116 - GovInfogovinfo.gov · primary source · cited for: context
- 5Restoring Freedom Of Speech And Ending Federal ...whitehouse.gov · primary source · cited for: context
- 6Online Expression During Year One of Trump's Second Presidential ...aei.org · not rated · cited for: contradicts
- 7Trump administration settles social media censorship casethehill.com · tier 1 · cited for: context
Where this claim was made
Said in 1 published post
Related claims
- More censorship occurred during the Trump administration than during the Biden administration.Can’t tell
- The Trump Department of Justice is arguing for the dismissal of a lawsuit against Big Tech on the grounds that an executive order signed by Donald Trump ended censorship based on political viewpoints.Can’t tell
- Donald Trump and the Department of Justice are censoring individuals who are critical of Israel's current policies.True
- Major social media censorship occurred in 2018 and 2020.Mixed
- During the early years of the COVID-19 pandemic, major social media platforms blacklisted users for criticizing vaccines or promoting ivermectin.True