Donald Trump was charged with fraud against a bank in New York City.
Posted by The Dan Bongino Show, Checked
- Sources
- 3 support4 context
- Said
- 1 time·
- Confidence
- 70%
The Dan Bongino ShowOct 19, 2026
Sources show New York Attorney General Letitia James brought a civil fraud case in New York state court against Donald Trump, alleging he inflated his net worth to induce banks and insurers to lend and insure on better terms, and a judge ruled him liable.
What was said
… There is no amount of guard rails, because they don't about the guardrails. The Pfizer court was supposed to be a guardrail. The court system was supposed to be a guardrail. Donald Trump got hauled in front of a court in New York City for a crime or civil litigation no sane person could figure out what the crime was. Well, he committed fraud against a bank. The bank's like, "No, he didn't. We love this business. We want more." That actually happened. This is your alternative on the ballot. Even if you're a hardcore Democrat, you want a tyrannical government threatening to target its political opponents? …
The Dan Bongino Show · · from the transcriptPost →What we found
Supports. Reuters reports the civil fraud case brought by New York state against Trump, in which a trial judge found his real estate business practices fraudulent and ordered $454.2 million in penalties for inflating his net worth to dupe lenders and insurers.[1]
Supports. The New York Attorney General's office states Justice Engoron ruled in her favor in the civil fraud case against Trump, finding he engaged in massive fraud to falsely inflate his net worth, and FactCheck.org describes the suit as alleging Trump inflated asset values to bilk banks.[2][4]
Context. The case was a civil action in New York Supreme Court, not a criminal indictment; the criminal case in New York concerned falsified business records, a different charge.[3][5]
Context. Trump disputed the bank-harm framing, saying no bank was hurt and loans were repaid, while the state argued the statute did not require victims; this dispute concerns the merits, not whether the fraud charge against banks was brought.[6][7]
Sources
7 sources: 3 fact-checkers, 1 primary, 1 tier 2, 1 tier 1, 1 not rated
- 1Appellate judges skeptical of New York civil fraud case against Trumpreuters.com · fact-checker · cited for: supports
- 2Trump Distorts the Facts About His New York Civil Trial - FactCheck.orgfactcheck.org · fact-checker · cited for: supports
- 3Tracking the criminal and civil cases against Donald Trumpapnews.com · fact-checker · cited for: context
- 4Attorney General James Wins Landmark Victory in Case Against ...ag.ny.gov · primary source · cited for: supports
- 5Trump's 2024 trials: Where they stand and what to expect | PBS Newspbs.org · tier 2 · cited for: context
- 6Fact-checking Trump's claims about New York fraud trialbbc.com · tier 1 · cited for: context
- 7Donald Trump Rages Outside Fraud Trialbusinessinsider.com · not rated · cited for: context
Where this claim was made
Said in 1 published post
Related claims
- The bank involved in the New York City fraud case against Donald Trump stated that they wanted more business with him.True
- Donald Trump claimed that Michael Cohen recanted his testimony in the New York cases.True
- Donald Trump has been mugshotted, tried, fined, and shot.True
- Donald Trump was indicted in Georgia.True