Polygraph

An Oklahoma state house committee voted to ban AP History for not sugarcoating slavery enough.

Posted by The Daily Show: Ears Edition, Checked

Polygraph verdictTrue
Sources
2 support3 context
Said
1 time·
Confidence
60%
The Daily Show: Ears EditionAug 28, 2026
View on Podcast ↗
Video frame
32 claimsThe check →

An Oklahoma House education committee did vote, in February 2015, to pass a bill restricting state funds for AP U.S. History, and sources describe it as a ban. The sources frame the objection as the course's negative portrayal of America and its focus on race, which fairly matches 'not sugarcoating slavery', though no source uses that exact phrase.

What was said

… Fine, we're gonna get Frivols again. Just stop crying. 15 states have approved voter ID laws in the absence of any meaningful evidence of voter fraud. An Oklahoma state house committee voted to ban A p history for not sugarcoating slavery enough. Abstinence is approved, sex education and scientific fact isn't reported, now it's debated. So let's just stop. Let's stop pretending that these concessions to the right will at any point sate the beast. What do you make of Pope Francis? …
The Daily Show: Ears Edition · · from the transcriptPost →

What we found

Supports. Brown Political Review reports that the Oklahoma House Education Committee voted on February 16, 2015 to ban the AP U.S. History curriculum from state high schools.[1]

Supports. NEA reports that the House education committee voted 11-4 in mid-February to pass HB 1380, which barred state funds from being used for AP History.[2]

Context. Sponsor Rep. Dan Fisher's stated rationale was that the AP framework shows 'what is bad about America' and portrays the U.S. as a 'nation of oppressors,' and Vox says conservatives objected to its negative presentation and emphasis on racism. This is a paraphrase of the claim's motive, not an identical quote.[1][2][3][4]

Context. The measure was a funding restriction rather than a full curriculum ban, and it died without a floor vote; the claim's 'ban' wording is loose but matches how several sources describe it.[2][5]

Sources

5 sources: 4 not rated, 1 tier 2

  1. 1Oklahoma! A Case Against the AP US History Ban - Brown Political Reviewbrownpoliticalreview.org · not rated · cited for: supports, context
  2. 2Oklahoma Educators Quash Attempt to Ban AP U.S. History | NEAnea.org · not rated · cited for: supports, context
  3. 3How conservatives forced changes to AP US history to ... - Voxvox.com · tier 2 · cited for: context
  4. 4American Historyamericanprogress.org · not rated · cited for: context
  5. 5History Wars Exposedpoliticalresearch.org · not rated · cited for: context

Where this claim was made

Said in 1 published post

How Polygraph checks a claim

Our Weekly Newsletter

The Readout

The week's most-shared posts, checked. What they claimed, how they argued, and what held up.

Unsubscribe any time. See our privacy policy.