Of the seven stadium venues that objected to Macklemore's inclusion, five are publicly owned by a city, county, or state.
Posted by Behind the Bastards, Checked
- Sources
- 4 support1 context
- Said
- 1 time·
- Confidence
- 70%
Behind the BastardsOct 3, 2026
The Rolling Stone list of seven venues that reportedly objected to Macklemore, as relayed by North Jersey, identifies five as publicly owned (Lincoln Financial Field, Mercedes-Benz, Lucas Oil, AT&T Stadium, Raymond James) and two as privately owned (Gillette, Bank of America), matching the claim.
This claim is about the present, so it is judged as of the day it was checked.
What was said
… It could be speaking out about AI. It could be speaking out about any issue. Here's where things get interesting. Rolling Stone lists seven stadium venues that allegedly objected to Macklemore's inclusion in the tour, and of those seven, five are publicly owned by either the city, county, or state in which they reside. I could spend quite a lot of time talking about how I think Ed Sheeran is a coward, how it is a political statement to fold in favor of genocide deniers, but what I'm far more interested in is the First Amendment implications of Kraft's alleged actions and …
Behind the Bastards · · from the transcriptPost →What we found
Supports. North Jersey reports that of the seven venues named in the report, only Gillette and Bank of America are privately owned, while Lucas Oil and Raymond James are run by public agencies and the rest are publicly owned but privately operated, giving five publicly owned venues.[1]
Supports. IndyStar and GBH News confirm that Lucas Oil Stadium and Raymond James Stadium are publicly owned, consistent with the five-of-seven count.[2][3]
Supports. A Substack summary attributes to Rolling Stone the finding that government bodies own five of the seven stadiums that allegedly objected to Macklemore.[4]
Context. The claimant's podcast transcript repeats the five-of-seven figure, but it is the claimant's own words and cannot corroborate the claim.[5]
Sources
5 sources: 5 not rated
- 1Macklemore's ouster puts public venues and free speech in spotlightnorthjersey.com · not rated · cited for: supports
- 2Lucas Oil Stadium 'played no part' in Macklemore removal, exec saysindystar.com · not rated · cited for: supports
- 3Did Macklemore's ouster violate the First Amendment? One ...wgbh.org · not rated · cited for: supports
- 4Macklemore Dropped From Ed Sheeran's Tour After ...historycanthide.substack.com · not rated · cited for: supports
- 5Were Macklemore's First Amendment Rights Violated? - iHeartiheart.com · not rated · cited for: context
Where this claim was made
Said in 1 published post
Related claims
- Rolling Stone listed seven stadium venues that objected to Macklemore's inclusion in the tour.True
- The state of Florida owns one of the stadiums where Macklemore was scheduled to perform.Can’t tell
- Privately owned stadiums are at liberty to decide whether or not to host specific events or speakers.True
- The Tampa Sports Authority owns and operates the stadium in Tampa where Macklemore was scheduled to perform.True
- Ed Sheeran stated that Robert Kraft rallied other stadium owners with an ultimatum that if Macklemore stayed on the tour, they would not be allowed to play in those venues.Can’t tell