Polygraph

Chinese research models calculate they can improve American public opinion of the Chinese government and Communist Party by an average of 14 percentage points.

Posted by Bannon`s War Room, Checked

Polygraph verdictTrue
Sources
1 support1 context
Said
1 time·
Confidence
60%
Bannon`s War RoomAug 17, 2026
View on Podcast ↗
Video frame
53 claimsThe check →

The only source addressing the figure, a Substack report on Renmin researcher Lü Jie's 2021 study, says the study calculated an average 14-point improvement in Americans' opinion of China when their assessment of Chinese culture, the government's responsiveness, or China's international conduct moved from negative to positive.

This claim is about the present, so it is judged as of the day it was checked.

What was said

… Quote, "The American public is precisely a key field where U.S. Direct international communication can exert influence." In this, they're going through all the ways that they can target American voters, and their conclusion is that they calculate that they can change an American's assessment of Chinese culture, the Chinese government, the Chinese Communist Party, their international conduct, how they interact with the United States, to an average 14 point improvement, translation, make Americans like China by a 14% point percentage increase, with some of these models that they're running to understand American voters, and then take the tech, the chips, all of it that we've given them, the research, to throw it back in …
Bannon`s War Room · · from the transcriptPost →

What we found

Supports. The Substack report describes Lü Jie's 2021 Renmin study, which calculated an average 14-point improvement in an American's overall opinion of China when assessments of Chinese culture, the Chinese government's responsiveness, or China's international conduct shifted from negative to positive.[1]

Context. The study's 14-point figure reflects a correlation drawn from eight waves of American election surveys (2010–2020) combined with news and search data, not a tested intervention result. The report also describes the study as a basis for a communication strategy.[1]

Context. The 14-point figure rests on a single outlet (credibility 0.40) that describes the study; the primary paper is not among the sources, so corroboration is thin.[1]

Context. Pew data in the sources shows American views of China becoming more favorable over 2023–2026, but none of these sources addresses the 14-point study figure.[2]

Sources

2 sources: 2 not rated

  1. 1Chinese State Researchers Mapped How To Target ...nataliegwinters.substack.com · not rated · cited for: supports, context
  2. 2Is Donald Trump's ‘Chinamaxxing' pushing Beijing's soft power?scmp.com · not rated · cited for: context

Where this claim was made

Said in 1 published post

How Polygraph checks a claim

Our Weekly Newsletter

The Readout

The week's most-shared posts, checked. What they claimed, how they argued, and what held up.

Unsubscribe any time. See our privacy policy.