The appellate court ruled that the dismissal of the USGIP free association claim in January 2023 was an error.
Posted by Badlands Media, Checked
- Sources
- 4 context
- Said
- 1 time·
- Confidence
- 15%
Badlands MediaAug 11, 2026
None of the provided sources addresses the USIP (U.S. Institute of Peace) free association claim or any appellate ruling in that case, so the claim can be neither confirmed nor refuted. The extraction faithfully reflects the post, which is the claimant's own unsourced account and cannot corroborate itself.
What was said
… And, uhm, we're going back to trial, but the reason that we're going back to trial, biggest reason, is that USCIP One Person One Vote. It will be tomorrow, yes. USCIP was the free association, and they were thrown out in January of 2023, and the appellate court said that that was an error, and it was an error that impacted everything. So we have to do in a trial. USCIP cannot be represented pro se, so we are going to have to hire attorneys to be able to fully fight this and protect the First Amendment from this subversion that's happening. …
Badlands Media · · from the transcriptPost →What we found
Context. The sources concern unrelated cases: an AP story on North Carolina's photo voter ID law, a copyright amicus brief, a Department of Education motion to dismiss, and an unrelated Oregon bar association ruling. None mentions a January 2023 dismissal of a USIP free association claim or an appellate ruling calling it an error.[1][2][3][4]
Sources
4 sources: 1 fact-checker, 1 primary, 2 not rated
- 1NAACPapnews.com · fact-checker · cited for: context
- 2ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 20, 2023congress.gov · primary source · cited for: context
- 3UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTstorage.courtlistener.com · not rated · cited for: context
- 4Crowe v. Oregon State Barcourtlistener.com · not rated · cited for: context
Where this claim was made
Said in 1 published post
Related claims
- USGIP cannot be represented pro se in the upcoming trial.Can’t tell
- The D.C. Circuit appellate court denied an appeal to allow the Social Security Administration to continue using the SAVE database for eligibility verification.True
- The appeals court ruled that the White House could not arbitrarily deny press passes in the case of Robert Sherill.True