The speakers insured the fire truck for a value of 100,000 dollars.
Posted by Unsubscribe Podcast, Checked
- Sources
- 4 context
- Said
- 1 time·
- Confidence
- 30%
Unsubscribe PodcastSep 13, 2026
The only source that addresses the insurance conversation is the podcast transcript itself (same show, same speaker), which repeats the claim and cannot corroborate it, and no independent record covers the fire truck's insurance or its coverage amount.
This claim is about the present, so it is judged as of the day it was checked.
What was said
… I'm like, hey, I got a fire truck. He's like, yeah, an ice cream truck? I like, I didn't say ice cream truck. I said fire truck. So I go to insurance, like, how much you want? Like, a hundred grand. If this thing burns to the ground, I need a hundred grand. It's like, okay, that's 800 dollars a year. I'm like, mm, fantastic price. Rich calls me up. He's like, ah, Antifa marked the Murgs. I put it in a video, and they, like, want to burn down, like, 150. Yeah, mm-hmm. It's like, probably one of the best gambles ever. Yeah, firebomb Malta cocktail. …
Unsubscribe Podcast · · from the transcriptPost →What we found
Context. The transcript in source 3 repeats the broker exchange ('100 grand... $800 a year') from the same podcast, so it is the claimant's own account and is circular rather than independent corroboration.[2]
Context. No independent source covers the podcast hosts' fire truck, its insurance policy, or any coverage amount; the court opinions and insurance guides in the set concern unrelated policies and accidents.[1][3][4]
Sources
4 sources: 1 primary, 3 not rated
- 1Automobile Insurance Text Versioninsurance.ca.gov · primary source · cited for: context
- 2Our Craziest Deployment & Police Stories ft. Angry Cops & Joe | Unsubscribe Podcast Ep 281youtube.com · not rated · cited for: context
- 3Mammina v. Homeland Insurance Co. of America – CourtListener.comcourtlistener.com · not rated · cited for: context
- 4Waseca Mut. Ins. Co. v. Noska (Minn. 1983)supreme.justia.com · not rated · cited for: context
Where this claim was made
Said in 1 published post