Polygraph

The Supreme Court lifted a judicial decision blocking the Trump administration from implementing an executive order to restrict the use of mail-in ballots.

Posted by The Rob Carson Show, Checked

Polygraph verdictTrue
Sources
5 support5 context
Said
1 time·
Confidence
92%
The Rob Carson ShowAug 25, 2026
View on Podcast ↗
Video frame
41 claimsThe check →

On 2026-08-24 the Supreme Court lifted the injunction by Judge Talwani that blocked the administration from implementing Trump's March executive order on mail-in ballots, so the claim is accurate as of the claim date.

The host relays this claim without endorsing it. It counts as passed on, not against the post.

This claim is about the present, so it is judged as of the day it was checked.

What was said

… Oh no, I'll get the other one. Hundreds of thousands of illegals have been registered to vote around the country, by the way, and it's all by design. That's why the Democrat Party opened the southern border. But President Donald Trump's administration now, the Supreme Court lifted a judicial decision blocking the administration from implementing his order to restrict the use of mail-in ballots ahead of the November election that will decide the control of Congress. Trump's executive order issued in March, listen to how despotic this is directed the Department of Homeland Security to compile and transmit a list to states, a list of US. …
The Rob Carson Show · · from the transcriptPost →

What we found

Supports. Reuters reports that on Monday, August 24, 2026, the Supreme Court lifted one court order blocking the administration from implementing Trump's executive order restricting mail-in ballots ahead of the midterms.[1][6]

Supports. NBC, Politico, and NPR independently report the 6-3 Supreme Court action lifting the June injunction by Judge Talwani that had blocked key parts of the order.[3][4][5]

Context. A separate Talwani injunction from August 11, brought by voting-rights groups, still blocks the Postal Service from implementing the order nationwide, so the order was not fully unblocked.[1][5][8][9]

Context. The Supreme Court's ruling was procedural, finding the states' challenge premature, and did not decide the order's legality; later September coverage reports further appellate and Supreme Court rulings against the administration on the Postal Service provisions.[2][7][10]

Sources

10 sources: 2 fact-checkers, 4 tier 2, 4 not rated

  1. 1US Supreme Court hands a win to Trump over mail-in ballot restrictionsreuters.com · fact-checker · cited for: supports, context
  2. 2Appeals court hands Trump a loss on mail voting ...apnews.com · fact-checker · cited for: context
  3. 3Supreme Court hands preliminary win to Trump on mail-in ...nbcnews.com · tier 2 · cited for: supports
  4. 4Supreme Court lifts one block on Trump mail-in voting planpolitico.com · tier 2 · cited for: supports
  5. 5Supreme Court gives Trump an interim win on his mail voting order, but hurdles loomnpr.org · tier 2 · cited for: supports, context
  6. 6US Supreme Court hands a win to Trump over mail-in ballot restrictionsnewsobserver.com · not rated · cited for: supports
  7. 7What Trump’s Supreme Court win means for mail ballots - CNNcnn.com · tier 2 · cited for: context
  8. 8Supreme Court gives Trump win in mail ballot dispute, but fight continuesusatoday.com · not rated · cited for: context
  9. 9Supreme Court clears hurdle for Trump mail-voting orderstlamerican.com · not rated · cited for: context
  10. 10Supreme Court denies Trump administration's request to ...scotusblog.com · not rated · cited for: context

Where this claim was made

Said in 1 published post

How Polygraph checks a claim

Our Weekly Newsletter

The Readout

The week's most-shared posts, checked. What they claimed, how they argued, and what held up.

Unsubscribe any time. See our privacy policy.