Polygraph

The Nuremberg indictments alleged that a criminal conspiracy existed within the Third Reich leadership.

Posted by The Pete Quiñones Show, Checked

Polygraph verdictTrue
Sources
5 support2 context
Said
1 time·
Confidence
90%
The Pete Quiñones ShowOct 10, 2026
View on Podcast ↗
Video frame
147 claimsThe check →

The Nuremberg indictments did allege a criminal conspiracy among the top Nazi leadership: Count 1 charged a common plan or conspiracy, and prosecutors said the defendants ruled the German state through a criminal conspiracy. The claimant's 'preposterous' opinion is not graded, and 'Reich leadership' and 'Third Reich leadership' refer to the same group.

The host relays this claim without endorsing it. It counts as passed on, not against the post.

What was said

… Um, you know, so, in other words, two, if, uh, Eichmann was the only one charged, he's the only defendant who was charged in this way, two. Regardless of the, I mean, the Nuremberg indictments were preposterous, but they were very clear that they were alleging that a criminal conspiracy existed within the Reich leadership, and the men so hailed into court and named in the indictment constituted the control group of the Third Reich, okay? And it came something like the dock out trials. …
The Pete Quiñones Show · · from the transcriptPost →

What we found

Supports. The IMT indictment of October 18, 1945 charged the defendants with conspiracy as Count 1, alleging a common plan or conspiracy to commit crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity.[1][4][5]

Supports. The prosecutors' opening statement accused the defendants of having ruled over the entire German State and war machine through a criminal conspiracy.[3]

Supports. Chief prosecutor Robert Jackson's team documented the 'inner workings of the German conspiracy' in the indictment's case, as AP reported at the trial's 75th anniversary.[2]

Context. The Atlantic's 1946 analysis notes that Count 1 charged a 'conspiracy' as a separate substantive offense, and that the charge was used against top Nazi leaders and bureaucrats.[6][7]

Sources

7 sources: 2 fact-checkers, 1 primary, 3 not rated, 1 tier 2

  1. 1Fact Check: Media NOT 'Put To Death For Lying' At Nuremberg Trialsleadstories.com · fact-checker · cited for: supports
  2. 2Germany marks 75th anniversary of landmark Nuremberg trialsapnews.com · fact-checker · cited for: supports
  3. 3Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Vol. 7avalon.law.yale.edu · primary source · cited for: supports
  4. 4International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg | Holocaust Encyclopediaencyclopedia.ushmm.org · not rated · cited for: supports
  5. 5Nuremberg trials | Summary, Significance, Defendants ...britannica.com · not rated · cited for: supports
  6. 6Nuremberg: A Fair Trial? A Dangerous Precedent - The Atlantictheatlantic.com · tier 2 · cited for: context
  7. 7Nuremberg trials - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org · not rated · cited for: context

Where this claim was made

Said in 1 published post

How Polygraph checks a claim

Our Weekly Newsletter

The Readout

The week's most-shared posts, checked. What they claimed, how they argued, and what held up.

Unsubscribe any time. See our privacy policy.