Polygraph

The Supreme Court stayed a preliminary injunction in the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition case on September 28 or 29 of last year, allowing a pocket rescission to go forward.

Posted by The Lawfare Podcast, Checked

Polygraph verdictMixed
Sources
4 contradict2 context
Said
1 time·
Confidence
70%
The Lawfare PodcastOct 8, 2026
View on Podcast ↗
Video frame
61 claimsThe check →

The core claim holds: the Supreme Court stayed the preliminary injunction in the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition case in 2025, allowing the pocket rescission of about $4 billion to proceed. However, the sources date the stay to September 26, 2025, not September 28 or 29 as the claim states.

Minor detail. The sources confirm the claim; only a minor detail differs, such as a name's spelling, a title's wording or a rounding.

We could not find who says this in the episode. Shown here; not scored.

What we found

Contradicts. Multiple sources, including the Supreme Court docket, give the stay date as September 26, 2025, not September 28 or 29 as the claim states.[3][4][5][6]

Supports. The Supreme Court granted the administration's stay application in the AVAC case, letting the government impound roughly $4 billion subject to a pocket rescission.[3][4][5][6]

Context. The earlier September 9 action was only an administrative partial stay by Chief Justice Roberts, not the decision that let the pocket rescission go forward.[1][3]

Context. The pocket rescission concept itself is described in the AP report of August 29, 2025, which reports the first use of the maneuver in nearly 50 years.[2]

Sources

6 sources: 2 fact-checkers, 1 primary, 3 not rated

  1. 1US Supreme Court pauses judge's order that Trump spend foreign aidreuters.com · fact-checker · cited for: context
  2. 2Trump blocks $4.9B in foreign aid Congress ...apnews.com · fact-checker · cited for: context
  3. 3No. 25A269 - Search - Supreme Court of the United Statessupremecourt.gov · primary source · cited for: contradicts, supports, context
  4. 4Fact Sheet: The Supreme Court's Decision in AIDS Vaccine ...citizen.org · not rated · cited for: contradicts, supports
  5. 5AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition v. U.S. Department of Statedemocracy2025.org · not rated · cited for: contradicts, supports
  6. 6Department of State v. AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org · not rated · cited for: contradicts, supports

Where this claim was made

Said in 1 published post

How Polygraph checks a claim

Our Weekly Newsletter

The Readout

The week's most-shared posts, checked. What they claimed, how they argued, and what held up.

Unsubscribe any time. See our privacy policy.