Food companies are legally required to have studies showing that the amount of sugar they recommend for daily use for children does not harm them.
Posted by The Joe Rogan Experience, Checked
- Sources
- 4 context
- Said
- 1 time·
- Confidence
- 30%
The Joe Rogan ExperienceNov 6, 2026
None of the provided sources addresses whether food companies are legally required to hold studies showing that recommended daily child sugar amounts are harmless; the claim is a legal-obligation assertion the sources do not cover. The extraction is faithful to the passage, which is the claimant's own unsourced belief ('I would imagine they don't have that.
This claim is about the present, so it is judged as of the day it was checked.
What was said
… It's been a full self-policing from the food industry, where they are able to self-certify both in the ingredients and, importantly, the amount of the ingredient having an impact or not. So you have all these things marketed kids with high sugar. They're actually legally responsible for having studies showing how the amount of sugar that they're recommending for, you know, daily use for kids actually doesn't harm kids. I would imagine they don't have that. They're legally required to have that. This would open up the door to start that conversation, getting the truth out, not nothing regulatory. Uhm, we did a 60 Minutes, we got full White House approval, we went through the interagency process, and we were gonna do a big initiative on basic food …
The Joe Rogan Experience · · from the transcriptPost →What we found
Context. The FDA labeling guide and the EU nutrition-claims guidance cover labeling rules and the distinction between mandatory and voluntary claims, but neither mentions a requirement for safety studies on recommended daily child sugar amounts.[1][3]
Context. The UNICEF brief says no governments have enacted a comprehensive set of mandatory legal measures to protect children from unhealthy food environments, which is indirect and does not address company study obligations for sugar amounts.[4]
Context. The regulations.gov petition states that conclusive evidence on the safety of non-nutritive sweeteners for children is lacking, which concerns the state of the evidence rather than any legal duty to produce studies.[2]
Sources
4 sources: 2 primary, 2 not rated
- 1Food Labeling Guidefda.gov · primary source · cited for: context
- 2Udownloads.regulations.gov · primary source · cited for: context
- 320 December 2004 - Food Safetyfood.ec.europa.eu · not rated · cited for: context
- 4HOW FOOD ENVIRONMENTS ARE FAILING CHILDREN - UNICEF DATAdata.unicef.org · not rated · cited for: context
Where this claim was made
Said in 1 published post
Related claims
- The food industry currently operates under a system of self-policing where companies self-certify the ingredients and the amounts of ingredients in their products.True
- The United States government funds the distribution of tens of millions of donuts and sugary pastries to children for breakfast every day.Can’t tell
- Ultra-processed foods account for nearly 70 percent of total caloric intake among American children.False
- The current federal school lunch policy does not require protein at breakfast.True
- Ultra-processed food consumption accounts for 10% of a child's diet in Spain.False