Polygraph

The November 2014 House Intelligence Committee report concluded there was no stand-down order given during the Benghazi attack.

Posted by The Daily Show: Ears Edition, Checked

Polygraph verdictTrue
Sources
5 support
Said
1 time·
Confidence
90%
The Daily Show: Ears EditionAug 28, 2026
View on Podcast ↗
Video frame
32 claimsThe check →

The November 2014 House Intelligence Committee report concluded there was no stand-down order, as stated by the committee chairman, the BBC, AP, Politico and CNN.

The host relays this claim without endorsing it. It counts as passed on, not against the post.

What was said

… Answering those many questions: Did Susan Rice go on TV and try to deceive anyone? Report says no. Did the administration ignore credible warnings about that day's attack? Report says no. Was there a stand down order or failure to rescue those individuals and send rescue planes? Report says no. Was there a massive intelligence agency cover-up? Report says no. Not CIA, not FBI, none of them, which means all these elements in the two-year Benghazi rage GASM were what do you call it? What do you call it? Tsunami of misinformation. …
The Daily Show: Ears Edition · · from the transcriptPost →

What we found

Supports. Chairman Rogers' statement on the final report says the committee 'concluded that there was no stand down order issued by or to intelligence community personnel.'[2]

Supports. The BBC reports that the committee's November 2014 report found 'no evidence that there was a stand-down order' and that there was no delay in sending a CIA rescue team.[3]

Supports. AP quotes the 2014 House Intelligence Committee report as finding 'no evidence that there was either a stand down order or a denial of available air support.'[1]

Supports. Politico and CNN both report that the November 21, 2014 committee report dismissed the stand-down claim, with CNN specifically citing no stand-down order to CIA operatives.[4][5]

Context. The report's scope was limited: the committee said it does not make final conclusions about other agencies (DoD, State, White House) beyond its intelligence-focused investigation, so the no-stand-down finding is strongest for intelligence personnel.[2]

Sources

5 sources: 1 fact-checker, 1 primary, 1 tier 1, 2 tier 2

  1. 1AP FACT CHECK: Benghazi movie misstates some facts - AP Newsapnews.com · fact-checker · cited for: supports
  2. 2Statement by Chairman Rogers on House Intelligence Committee's ...intelligence.house.gov · primary source · cited for: supports, context
  3. 3Benghazi consulate attack: Report clears US response - BBC Newsbbc.com · tier 1 · cited for: supports
  4. 4House Intel Committee dismisses some Benghazi mythspolitico.com · tier 2 · cited for: supports
  5. 5Republican-led report debunks Benghazi accusations - CNNcnn.com · tier 2 · cited for: supports

Where this claim was made

Said in 1 published post

How Polygraph checks a claim

Our Weekly Newsletter

The Readout

The week's most-shared posts, checked. What they claimed, how they argued, and what held up.

Unsubscribe any time. See our privacy policy.