The Supreme Court declined to block an executive order that announced Donald Trump's plans to interfere with the election using the U.S. Postal Service.
Posted by Strict Scrutiny, Checked
- Sources
- 6 support3 context
- Said
- 1 time·
- Confidence
- 70%
Strict ScrutinySep 15, 2026
The Supreme Court's August 24, 2026 stay lifted the lower court's injunction, letting Trump's March executive order proceed, and the order directed the Postal Service to act on mail ballots.
A guest makes this claim. Listeners heard it, so it counts against the post, and on the guest's own record.
What was said
… Act and cleared the way for a little unprecedented, completely unorthodox, mid-cycling redistricting, where Republicans are authorized and indeed encouraged to cheat democracy and erase the political power of Democratic voters and Black voters in particular. This is the same Court that just a few weeks ago opted not to block the underlying executive order, the same one that announced Donald Trump's plans to try and interfere with this election, including using the US. Postal Service to do so, and then just kind of strung us along for these valuable days as the election drew ever nearer, as we all wondered, are we really going to have an election that works in any meaningful way or not? …
Strict Scrutiny · · from the transcriptPost →What we found
Supports. The Supreme Court stayed Judge Talwani's injunction on August 24, 2026, allowing the executive order's implementation to proceed, which matches 'declined to block the executive order'.[1][3][4][6]
Supports. The executive order directed the U.S. Postal Service to pursue rulemaking that would limit delivery of mail ballots, so the Postal Service element of the claim is supported.[2][5][6]
Context. The Court's September 14 ruling later refused to let the USPS implement the rule for the 2026 elections, and the Court's rulings were procedural, not a ruling on the order's legality.[5][7][8][9]
Context. Characterizing the order as announcing plans to 'interfere with the election' is a framing the sources do not adopt; the White House denied improper interference, and the claim's wording is taken from the claimant's post.[8]
Sources
9 sources: 2 primary, 3 tier 2, 2 tier 1, 2 not rated
- 126A124 Trump v. California (08/24/2026)supremecourt.gov · primary source · cited for: supports
- 2Supreme Court allows Trump's order to proceed, for ... - Oregon.govapps.oregon.gov · primary source · cited for: supports
- 3Supreme Court gives Trump an interim win on his mail voting order, but hurdles loomnpr.org · tier 2 · cited for: supports
- 4Supreme Court lifts one block on Trump mail-in voting planpolitico.com · tier 2 · cited for: supports
- 5Trump criticises Supreme Court after justices block mail-in ...bbc.com · tier 1 · cited for: supports, context
- 6Supreme Court denies Trump administration's request to ...scotusblog.com · not rated · cited for: supports
- 7Supreme Court won't restore Trump's mail-in voting plan ...thehill.com · tier 1 · cited for: context
- 8Five Takeaways From ProPublica’s Midterm Election Coverage ...propublica.org · tier 2 · cited for: context
- 9Trump v. California | 609 U.S. ___ (2026)supreme.justia.com · not rated · cited for: context
Where this claim was made
Said in 1 published post
Related claims
- The Supreme Court blocked an executive order from the Trump administration that sought to change mail voting processes and give the U.S. Postal Service new abilities to decide who to deliver mail ballots to.True
- The Supreme Court ruled that President Trump can move forward with an executive order regarding the use of the Postal Service for mailing ballots.Mixed
- The Supreme Court blocked the Trump administration's executive order regarding mail-in voting regulations.Mixed
- The Supreme Court refused to allow Donald Trump to implement new orders for the United States Postal Service to screen mail-in ballots.True
- The Supreme Court allowed a Trump administration executive order to proceed that relates to the restriction of mail-in voting.True