Donald Trump is offering $1 million for tipoffs that lead to voter fraud convictions.

Posted by Raging Moderates with Scott Galloway and Jessica Tarlov, Oct 27, 2026Checked Nov 2, 2026

Polygraph verdictTrue

Sources: 7 support3 context
Said: 1 time·
Confidence: 90%

Raging Moderates with Scott Galloway and Jessica TarlovOct 27, 2026

… Is the Right feigning outrage over the former president’s “Cheesecake Factory” characterization? Beyond the celebrity cameos, around 30 million Americans have already voted, and Democrats are making up a larger share of early voters in key Senate races. Trump is suing states over election rules, threatening election officials and offering $1 million for tipoffs that lead to voter fraud convictions. Despite these efforts, Kalshi odds show Democrats have a 65% chance to take back the Senate. But with seven toss-ups projected, both parties are relying on voter turnout. Will Democratic efforts be enough to deliver the “blue wave” many have predicted? …

56 claimsThe check →

Multiple reliable sources (Reuters Portuguese, NBC, AP-derived coverage, ABC, Washington Examiner) confirm Trump announced on Oct.

This claim is in the show notes, the publisher's own words. It counts against the post, once.

This claim is about the present, so it is judged as of the day it was checked.

What we found

Supports. Trump's Truth Social post stated anyone reporting voter fraud in past elections or the 2026 midterms 'will be paid $1,000,000 upon the arrest and conviction of those that created the Fraud.'[3][4][5][6]

Supports. Reuters (Portuguese) reports Trump said the US will give US$1 million to anyone who reports voter fraud leading to arrest and conviction, dated Oct. 27 publication of an Oct. 26 event.[1][7]

Supports. AP coverage published Oct. 29 refers to the earlier-announced $1 million bounty for proof of prior or current voter fraud, though it is unclear how it would be followed through.[2]

Context. Sources state the funding source, administering agency, and application process were not specified, and the White House gave no further details; this does not contradict the offer.[3][4][8][9][10]

Context. Coverage describes the offer as tied to unfounded fraud claims and experts say there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud, but this bears on the offer's wisdom, not on whether it was made.[3][6][9]