The San Francisco Standard obtained federal subpoenas seeking six years of records involving the California State Protocol Foundation.
Posted by Philip Teresi, Checked
- Sources
- 6 support1 context
- Said
- 1 time·
- Confidence
- 85%
Philip TeresiOct 16, 2026
The San Francisco Standard's September 12, 2026 reporting says it reviewed federal subpoenas issued in early September that seek six years of records involving the California State Protocol Foundation, and The Hill, KCRA, USA Today, RecordNet and LA Times repeat that account.
The host relays this claim without endorsing it. It counts as passed on, not against the post.
What was said
… They're trying to find something anywhere, abusing the process, and it's a disgrace. I know nothing more than you know. This has left Democrats wondering what, if anything, President Trump is planning and how Governor Newsom will respond to this. Last month, the San Francisco Standard obtained federal subpoenas seeking six years of records involving the California State Protocol Foundation. This is, um, it's mostly funded by corporate donations, it's run by a board appointed by the governor, and its function is to pay for the governor's travel expenses. …
Philip Teresi · · from the transcriptPost →What we found
Supports. The Standard's September 12, 2026 article states that subpoenas reviewed by the paper, issued in early September, seek six years of records involving the California State Protocol Foundation.[2]
Supports. The Hill's October 15, 2026 piece says the Standard obtained federal subpoenas last month seeking six years of records involving the foundation, matching the claim's wording.[1]
Supports. KCRA, RecordNet, USA Today and LA Times all independently report the subpoenas for six years of foundation records, citing the Standard's reporting on the subpoenas.[3][4][5][6]
Context. Later coverage notes the U.S. Attorney's Office has refused to release the subpoenas, so the Standard's account rests on its own review of them rather than on public filings.[7]
Context. The claim matches the passage's content on this point; no source contradicts that the Standard obtained the subpoenas or their six-year scope.
Sources
7 sources: 1 tier 1, 6 not rated
- 1Mystery surrounds DOJ's investigation of Gavin Newsomthehill.com · tier 1 · cited for: supports
- 2New subpoenas show federal criminal probe focus on Newsom's travel and expensessfstandard.com · not rated · cited for: supports
- 3Federal probe targets Gavin Newsom travel records, aides and nonprofitrecordnet.com · not rated · cited for: supports
- 4Newsom brushes aside escalating DOJ probe into travel as retributionlatimes.com · not rated · cited for: supports
- 5Newsom calls DOJ probe into travel costs a 'baseless MAGA conspiracy'usatoday.com · not rated · cited for: supports
- 6Federal investigation into Newsom reportedly involves ...kcra.com · not rated · cited for: supports
- 7U.S. DOJ issues subpoenas in investigation of Newsom's ... - Yahooyahoo.com · not rated · cited for: context
Where this claim was made
Said in 1 published post
Related claims
- In 2020, the California State Protocol Foundation paid for Gavin Newsom to travel to Miami for the Super Bowl.True
- The California State Protocol Foundation was created during Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's tenure.Mixed
- Federal agents knocked on the doors of friends, family members, and former employees of Gavin Newsom four months ago.True
- California Governor Gavin Newsom announced an investigation into a probe of him and his wife four months ago.True
- Gavin Newsom hired defense attorney Abby Lowell.True