Polygraph

NOTUS on the net worth and individual stock trading practices of Vermont's congressional delegation

NOTUS on VTDigger, Checked

Polygraph score
100Holds up
Details
What it claims
5 can’t tell6 true
How it argues
Nothing found
How it persuades
Insinuation
What it’s built on
Nothing found
NOTUSArticle on VTDiggerMay 13, 2026
Read on VTDigger ↗

Skip to content Rep. Becca Balint and Sens. Bernie Sanders and Peter Welch. (AP photos) _This story by Torrie Herrington and Taylor Giorno_ _was first published_ _in NOTUS on May 8, 2026._ Vermont is home to several rare species. The Canada lynx. The American marten. And now, wealthy federal lawmakers who don’t trade individual stocks. Sens. Peter Welch and Bernie Sanders, along with Rep. Becca Balint, did not report owning any individual stocks on their most recent personal financial disclosures to Congress. Despite not trading stocks, the Vermont delegation is significantly wealthier than the average Vermonter. Welch and Balint both have median net worths of over $1 million, and Sanders’ is on the cusp. Welch, a Democrat, has a median net worth of more than $12.8 million, according to his latest financial disclosure, which covers 2025. The surge in his net worth from nearly $9.1 million in 2024 is driven by an increase in the value of an existing money market account and several mutual and exchange-traded funds, or ETFs. Welch’s largest asset is that money market account, which is worth between $1 million and $5 million, according to his latest disclosure. On his 2024 disclosure, Welch valued the account between $500,001 and $1 million. Welch and his wife, Margaret Cheney, also have dozens of mutual funds and ETFs that contribute to his net worth. Welch once traded individual stocks. But in 2021, Business Insider revealed the then-congressman failed to properly disclose that his wife sold $6,238 worth of ExxonMobil stock around the time Welch was grilling the oil company’s CEO at a House committee oversight hearing. Welch sold off his individual stocks after the report and pledged that he — and his wife — had decided to no longer trade individual stocks. Welch told VTDigger in 2020 that he was giving up stock trading: “The clearest way to avoid even the appearance of a conflict is to simply stop making purchases,” even through an adviser. While he backtracked on that pledge a few months later, neither he nor his wife has disclosed owning or trading individual stocks since the ExxonMobil incident, according to a NOTUS analysis of his financial disclosures. The Wealth of Vermont’s Congressional Delegation The Wealth of Vermont’s Congressional Delegation The median net worth of each member of the Vermont delegation. See an expanded version of the chart. | Lawmaker | Welch, Peter | | Assets (min/max) | Small line chart with 2 values, ranging from 5513100 to 13164000.<br>$5.5M$13.2M | | Spacer column | | | Liabilities (min/max) | Small line chart with 2 values, ranging from 100001 to 250000.<br>$100K$250K | | Spacer column | | | Net Worth (median) | $9.16M<br>$9.16M<br>$9.16M | | | | Lawmaker | Balint, Becca | | Assets (min/max) | Small line chart with 2 values, ranging from 679087 to 2571000.<br>$679.1K$2.6M | | Spacer column | | | Liabilities (min/max) | Small line chart with 2 values, ranging from 0 to 0.<br>$0$0 | | Spacer column | | | Net Worth (median) | $1.63M<br>$1.63M<br>$1.63M | | | | Lawmaker | Sanders, Bernard | | Assets (min/max) | Small line chart with 2 values, ranging from 613030 to 1695000.<br>$613K$1.7M | | Spacer column | | | Liabilities (min/max) | Small line chart with 2 values, ranging from 100001 to 250000.<br>$100K$250K | | Spacer column | | | Net Worth (median) | $979.01K<br>$979.01K<br>$979.01K | | Lawmaker | Assets (min/max) | Spacer column | Liabilities (min/max) | Spacer column | Net Worth (median) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Welch, Peter | Small line chart with 2 values, ranging from 5513100 to 13164000.<br>$5.5M$13.2M | | Small line chart with 2 values, ranging from 100001 to 250000.<br>$100K$250K | | $9.16M<br>$9.16M<br>$9.16M | | Balint, Becca | Small line chart with 2 values, ranging from 679087 to 2571000.<br>$679.1K$2.6M | | Small line chart with 2 values, ranging from 0 to 0.<br>$0$0 | | $1.63M<br>$1.63M<br>$1.63M | | Sanders, Bernard | Small line chart with 2 values, ranging from 613030 to 1695000.<br>$613K$1.7M | | Small line chart with 2 values, ranging from 100001 to 250000.<br>$100K$250K | | $979.01K<br>$979.01K<br>$979.01K | Table with 6 columns and 3 rows. Sorted descending by column "Net Worth (median)" (column headers with buttons are sortable) Degree of wealth meter $0$9.16M NOTUS calculated the median net worth of each lawmaker by first finding each member’s minimum net worth — the sum of the minimum value of all assets minus the sum of the maximum value of all their liabilities — and their maximum net worth — maximum asset value minus minimum liabilities. NOTUS then calculated the median between the minimum and maximum net worths. Read more about NOTUS’ methodology. Table:NOTUS TeamSource:Financial disclosure reports / House and SenateCreated with Datawrapper Balint’s median net worth is more than $1.6 million, according to her 2024 financial report, which shows Balint has several joint right of survivorship accounts with her wife, Elizabeth Wohl. They also own several individual retirement accounts, and Balint includes many D.C. education trusts in her assets. Balint, a Democrat, said in a statement to NOTUS that she does not trade “any individual stocks because I don’t ever want Vermonters to question the integrity of my decisions or my vote.” Balint sold the few stocks she owned before taking office in January 2023. She disclosed owning stocks including Adobe, Intuit and Netflix valued at “none” in 2022. The stocks were gone when she filed her 2023 financial disclosure report, which covered her first year in office. “They appear on that report only because there was income generated from their sale. Because she did not hold these stocks at any point in 2023, they do not appear on her 2023 disclosure,” said Catherine White, a spokesperson for Balint. Sanders, a self-described democratic socialist and the delegation’s longest-serving member, has a median net worth of $979,015. Sanders’ wealth has changed over the years. In 2011, the first year for which his disclosures are available online, he had a median net worth of $308,005. He once reached millionaire status, according to Politico, and in 2016, he spent nearly $600,000 on a lakefront summer home. Sanders has been a tough critic of those in the millionaire and billionaire class, despite having been a millionaire himself. Of late, Sanders’ economic messaging has shifted to focus on billionaires, and he even recently introduced legislation with Rep. Ro Khanna to tax billionaires at a higher rate. “At a time of unprecedented income and wealth inequality, this legislation demands that the billionaire class in America finally pay their fair share of taxes so that we can create an economy that works for all of us, not just the 1%,” Sanders said in a press release from March. “We can no longer tolerate a corrupt tax code that enables billionaires to pay a lower tax rate than the average worker.” According to Sanders’ 2024 annual financial disclosure, his spouse, Jane Sanders, owns over 20 mutual funds that contribute to his assets. They also reported owning a few joint bank accounts. The only debt they report is a mortgage valued between $100,000 and $250,000. Sanders disclosed that his wife owned IBM corporate securities stock in 2013 with a year-end value of “none” that generated capital gains income. He has not since reported owning any individual corporate stocks or securities, according to a NOTUS analysis of his personal financial disclosures. He now notes that his wife’s retirement accounts, which are broken out into underlying mutual funds, “are not individually held stocks.” Sanders made $148,750 in royalties from Penguin Random House in 2024 for his book, “It’s OK to Be Angry About Capitalism.” While lawmakers are typically prohibited from holding jobs outside of the Capitol, book writing is one loophole that numerous members of Congress, including Sanders, used to make extra money in 2024 beyond their congressional salary of $174,000, NOTUS previously reported. Sen. Bernie Sanders and his book “It‘s OK to Be Angry at Capitalism.” Jens Kalaene/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Federal lawmakers are required to disclose the value of certain assets — including but not limited to stocks, cryptocurrencies and properties that generate income — in ever-broader ranges on their financial disclosures to Congress each year. They also have to report liabilities such as credit card debt, student loans and mortgages on personal residences, which they do not have to disclose the value of as an asset. To best estimate lawmakers’ net worth, NOTUS analyzed the assets and liabilities listed on lawmakers’ annual financial disclosures and calculated the median of their minimum net worth — minimum total assets minus maximum liabilities — and maximum net worth — maximum total assets minus minimum liabilities. In addition to abstaining from stock trading themselves, Vermont’s congressional delegation wants to ban all members of Congress from trading stocks to avoid even the appearance that they may be profiting off their position, which often provides them access to information before the rest of the public. Balint has co-sponsored the Restore Trust in Congress Act, a bipartisan stock-ban bill introduced by Republican Rep. Chip Roy in 2025. Most notably, the bill would ban members of Congress and their immediate family members from owning or selling stocks. The bill has yet to advance out of committee to the full House, unlike the Stop Insider Trading Act — a Republican leadership-backed stock-ban bill with fewer restrictions — that awaits a vote before the full House. “No one should be getting rich because of their position in public office, which is why I support a full ban on stock trading for lawmakers and their immediate families. It is long past due that we turn guardrails like this into law — even the possibility of profiting from insider information erodes trust in our government and our democracy,” Balint said in a statement to NOTUS. When asked about where Sanders, an independent who caucuses with Democrats, stands on a congressional stock-trade ban, his office pointed out that Sanders is a co-sponsor of the Ending Trading and Holdings In Congressional Stocks Act. The bill, introduced by Democratic Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon in 2023, would prohibit members of Congress, their spouses and their dependents from purchasing or selling individual stocks. Aaron White, a spokesperson for Welch, also pointed to the ETHICS Act. “Senator Welch is a proud original cosponsor of the Ending Trading and Holdings in Congressional Stocks (ETHICS) Act, which would ban Members, spouses, and dependents from owning or trading stocks,” White said in a statement to NOTUS. “He’ll continue to fight to improve accountability and transparency in Congress and across the government.” The ETHICS Act has not been reintroduced in the Senate in the 119th Congress, but the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee passed a bill “closely resembling” the legislation, according to the nonprofit Issue One. The bill, which would ban the president and vice president in addition to lawmakers and their families from owning individual stocks, has not come to the Senate floor for a vote. A House committee voted in January to advance the Stop Insider Trading Act, which would prohibit lawmakers from buying new individual stocks but not require them to divest their current holdings. They would have to give seven days’ notice before selling existing holdings. Link Copy link Toggle photo metadata visibilityToggle photo comments visibility Loading Comments... Write a Comment... Email (Required)Name (Required)Website Download image

11 claims2 places a technique or frame shows

What it claims

Claims

  1. 1Can’t tellSens. Peter Welch and Bernie Sanders and Rep. Becca Balint did not report owning any individual stocks on their most recent personal financial disclosures to Congress.The only source directly addressing the claim is a VTDigger article (source 3, unrated, credibility 0.40) that repeats the assertion that Welch, Sanders and Balint reported no individual stocks; it is not a primary disclosure record, and no primary financial disclosure filings for these members are in the sources. Other sources are about bills, funding, elections, or repeat the claim (e.g., a Reddit repost of the VTDigger piece), so the claim cannot be independently verified as of 2026-05-13 and the extracted claim matches the passage without scope changes.10 sources →
  2. 2Can’t tellPeter Welch has a median net worth of more than $12.8 million as of his 2025 financial disclosure.The only source that states the claimed figure ($12.8 million median net worth, 2025 disclosure) is the vtdigger article, which repeats the claimant's wording and so is circular. Nearby figures (a 2023 disclosure range of roughly $4.9M to $13.6M, a Facebook post saying 'over $12 million', and a Quiver estimate of $10.0M as of September 2025) do not directly confirm or refute the 2025 disclosure median, and the primary sources (CRS, Senate RFI, FEC) do not address Welch's net worth. The extracted claim matches the passage's figure and timeframe without widening its scope.7 sources →
  3. 3Can’t tellPeter Welch's median net worth increased from nearly $9.1 million in 2024 to more than $12.8 million in 2025.Only one source, VTDigger (unrated, 0.40 credibility), reports a median net worth of more than $12.8 million for Welch from his latest financial disclosure covering 2025, which supports the 2025 figure. No source gives the 2024 figure of nearly $9.1 million, so the claimed increase cannot be confirmed. The Quiver ($10.0M, Sept 2025) and moomoo ($10.3M, Jan 2026) figures are live estimates rather than disclosure medians, so they are a different measure and do not directly contradict the claim. The extracted claim matches the passage's figures, though the passage does not use the word 'median' and the claim adds it.3 sources →
  4. 4TrueIn 2021, Peter Welch failed to properly disclose that his wife sold $6,238 worth of ExxonMobil stock around the time he was questioning the oil company’s CEO at a House committee oversight hearing.Sources support the core claim: Welch's wife sold ExxonMobil stock, and Welch failed to disclose it on time, with the $6,238 figure and timing near his questioning of Exxon's CEO at an Oversight hearing. The claim tracks the claimant's passage faithfully, and the 'failed to properly disclose' wording matches the sources' description of a late STOCK Act disclosure. Confidence is capped because the sources are mostly secondary, and some repeat the claimant's passage without independent support.6 sources →
  5. 5TrueBecca Balint has a median net worth of more than $1.6 million according to her 2024 financial report.Sources consistently report that Balint's median net worth exceeds $1.6 million according to her 2024 financial report, and the extracted claim matches the passage's wording. The figure traces back to NOTUS's calculation from financial disclosures, so the support is directional rather than independently verified.5 sources →
  6. 6Can’t tellBecca Balint sold stocks including Adobe, Intuit and Netflix before taking office in January 2023.None of the sources mention Adobe, Intuit or Netflix, or any sale of stock by Balint before January 2023, so the central assertion cannot be graded. The extracted claim also drops the passage's qualifiers that she sold only "the few stocks she owned" and that the holdings were valued at "none" in 2022.11 sources →
  7. 7TrueBernie Sanders made $148,750 in royalties from Penguin Random House in 2024 for his book, “It’s OK to Be Angry About Capitalism.”The Senate eFD annual report for 2024 for Bernard Sanders lists $148,750 in royalties from Penguin Random House, and multiple outlets repeat that figure. Note that the extracted claim ties the royalties to the book 'It's OK to Be Angry About Capitalism'; the disclosure line itself does not name the book, though one outlet (Washington Sun) states the publisher also published that book, so the book attribution is only lightly corroborated.8 sources →
  8. 8TrueThe congressional salary for members of Congress was $174,000 in 2024.Multiple tier1 fact-checkers (PolitiFact, Lead Stories, FactCheck.org context) and primary sources (CRS, House press release) confirm rank-and-file members of Congress earned a base salary of $174,000 in 2024, and the 2025 pay raise was blocked. The extracted claim matches the passage's figure and scope.7 sources →
  9. 9TrueBecca Balint is a co-sponsor of the Restore Trust in Congress Act, introduced by Rep. Chip Roy in 2025.Legiscan's official-data listing for H.R.5106, the Restore Trust in Congress Act introduced September 3, 2025, names Rep. Chip Roy and Rep. Becca Balint among its sponsors, which supports the claim that Balint co-sponsored a Roy-introduced 2025 bill of that name. Confidence is moderate because the only independent listing naming Balint is a truncated aggregator entry, Balint's own sponsored-bills page excerpt does not show the bill, and the claimant's VTDigger wording is circular and cannot corroborate.5 sources →
  10. 10TrueBernie Sanders is a co-sponsor of the Ending Trading and Holdings In Congressional Stocks Act, introduced by Sen. Jeff Merkley in 2023.Sanders is described as a sponsor of the ETHICS Act in a 2023 Politico report, and Merkley's own Senate press release confirms he introduced the ETHICS Act in 2023. The extracted word 'co-sponsor' is a label difference from 'sponsor' and does not change the core claim. Only one source directly addresses Sanders' role, so confidence is moderate.4 sources →
  11. 11Can’t tellBernie Sanders has a median net worth of $979,015 according to his 2024 annual financial disclosure.The only source giving the exact figure of $979,015 is the VTDigger passage, which repeats the claimant's words and cannot corroborate it. No independent source confirms that figure from Sanders' 2024 annual financial disclosure, and Ballotpedia notes that disclosure forms report value ranges rather than precise amounts. Other estimates vary widely, from about $1M to $1.2M in some sources to $1.5M-$2.5M in others, so the sources neither support nor refute the claimed figure.8 sources →

How it persuades

  • InsinuationHints at wrongdoing it never states, or states and disownsSanders has been a tough critic of those in the millionaire and billionaire class, despite having been a millionaire himself.book writing is one loophole that numerous members of Congress, including Sanders, used to make extra money

How Polygraph reads a postHow often are we wrong?

Our Weekly Newsletter

The Readout

The week's most-shared posts, checked. What they claimed, how they argued, and what held up.

Unsubscribe any time. See our privacy policy.