Democrats need 48 more electoral votes to enshrine a national popular vote.
Posted by Louder with Crowder, Checked
- Sources
- 4 support2 context
- Said
- 1 time·
- Confidence
- 80%
Louder with CrowderOct 5, 2026
Sources consistently report that the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact had 222 electoral votes pledged after Virginia joined in April 2026, leaving 48 short of the 270 needed, so the 48-vote figure was accurate as of 2026-10-05.
This claim is about the present, so it is judged as of the day it was checked.
What was said
… socialism, which includes Obamacare, US aid, soda on SNAP, Medicare for, uh, Medicaid for illegals, Social Security for illegals, open borders, criminalizing speech under the guise of hate speech, full on censorship. They'll get rid of the Electoral College. Democrats only need 48 more electoral votes to enshrine a national popular vote. They said that that's what they want to do, and, most importantly, on the heels of my debate at Harvard, free college for all, which is a glorified Ponzi scheme in which the taxpayer funds generational feminist Marxist propaganda and indoctrination, in which …
Louder with Crowder · · from the transcriptPost →What we found
Supports. NCSL's April 2026 status page lists 222 pledged electoral votes and states that 48 additional electoral votes are required for the compact to take effect.[3]
Supports. The National Popular Vote site and an October 2026 ABC6/National News Desk report both put the compact at 222 electoral votes, 48 short of 270, after Virginia's entry.[4][5]
Supports. A October 25, 2026 Fulcrum analysis says the 48-vote gap depends on Democrats gaining or holding legislative trifectas in battleground states, supporting the Democratic framing of the gap.[6]
Context. Sources describe the compact as an interstate agreement rather than a constitutional amendment, and a 2016 PolitiFact piece notes courts may not allow it to proceed, so 'enshrine' overstates its legal permanence.[1][2]
Sources
6 sources: 2 fact-checkers, 4 not rated
- 1Could states overturn the electoral college?politifact.com · fact-checker · cited for: context
- 2Story Misrepresents Abrams' Remarks on Electoral College - FactCheck.orgfactcheck.org · fact-checker · cited for: context
- 3National Popular Votencsl.org · not rated · cited for: supports
- 4One Plausible Path to Getting the Additional 48 Electoral ...nationalpopularvote.com · not rated · cited for: supports
- 5Democrats could change Electoral College if they win 4 state ...abc6onyourside.com · not rated · cited for: supports
- 6The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact Federalism ...thefulcrum.us · not rated · cited for: supports
Where this claim was made
Said in 1 published post