Polygraph

Dan Bell claimed on social media that votes were being stolen from him in real time during the primary election.

Posted by Louder with Crowder, Checked

Polygraph verdictCan’t tell
Sources
3 context
Said
1 time·
Confidence
20%
Louder with CrowderAug 19, 2026
View on Podcast ↗
Video frame
53 claimsThe check →

The passage never names the person it refers to; it says only "He", so the extracted name "Dan Bell" departs from the post, and the verdict is unverifiable on that basis. No source addresses any Dan Bell tweet about votes being stolen in real time, and the only Bell in the sources is a different candidate.

Our two reads of who says this, and how, disagree, so it counts as the post's own claim.

What we found

Context. The passage refers only to "He" and never names Dan Bell, so the extracted claim adds a name the post does not state.

Context. The one Bell in the sources is Jack Lloyd Bell II, a Florida primary candidate in the 8/18/2026 results; that is a different referent and does not address the claim.[1]

Context. Election officials and fact-checkers say real-time vote-flipping claims in 2026 are almost always user error or screen miscalibration, and no widespread reports were found; this concerns the broader trend, not the specific Dan Bell post.[2][3]

Sources

3 sources: 3 not rated

  1. 12026 Primary Election - Summary Results - Election Night Reportingenr.electionsfl.org · not rated · cited for: context
  2. 2Misinformation about voting spreads not long before ...standardspeaker.com · not rated · cited for: context
  3. 3What We Know About Claims That Early Voters' Ballots Were ...yahoo.com · not rated · cited for: context

Where this claim was made

Said in 1 published post

How Polygraph checks a claim

Our Weekly Newsletter

The Readout

The week's most-shared posts, checked. What they claimed, how they argued, and what held up.

Unsubscribe any time. See our privacy policy.