The Supreme Court refused to allow Donald Trump to implement new orders for the United States Postal Service to screen mail-in ballots.
Posted by Letters from an American, Checked
- Sources
- 5 support2 context
- Said
- 2 times·
- Confidence
- 92%
Letters from an AmericanSep 15, 2026
The sources consistently report that on September 14, 2026, the Supreme Court declined to let the U.S. Postal Service enforce its rule on mail-in ballots, leaving in place a lower-court injunction, which matches the claim.
What was said
… Then he posted, "I hope everyone realizes that price increases throughout America were caused by Sleepy Joe Biden and the Biden administration, not by Trump." Then, once again, he promised to give every American adult 5000 dollars. Tonight, over public dissents from Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, the Supreme Court refused to allow Trump to put into place his new orders for the United States Postal Service to screen mail-in ballots. This means Trump's attempt to stop the transmission of mail-in ballots will not be in effect for the 2026 midterm elections. Letters from an American was written and read by Heather Cox Richardson. …
Letters from an American · · from the transcriptPost →What we found
Supports. Reuters reports the Supreme Court declined on September 14, 2026 to let the USPS enforce a rule targeting mail-in ballots, denying the Justice Department's request to lift a block by Judge Talwani.[1]
Supports. The NYT and BBC both report the Court blocked the Trump administration's Postal Service plan for mail ballots, with the court saying the government was 'unlikely to succeed on the merits.'[2][3]
Supports. SCOTUSblog and ABC News confirm the brief unsigned order left in place the lower-court ruling barring the USPS from implementing the rule, with Alito and Thomas dissenting.[4][5]
Context. The rule required states to provide voter lists and use barcoded envelopes so USPS could deliver only matching ballots, which is the 'screening' the claim refers to; the ruling was an interim order and did not decide the rule's legality.[6][7]
Sources
7 sources: 1 fact-checker, 1 tier 1, 2 tier 2, 3 not rated
- 1In loss for Trump, US Supreme Court won't let Postal Service restrict mail ballotsreuters.com · fact-checker · cited for: supports
- 2Trump criticises Supreme Court after justices block mail-in ...bbc.com · tier 1 · cited for: supports
- 3Supreme Court Blocks Trump Administration Plan to ...nytimes.com · tier 2 · cited for: supports
- 4Supreme Court rejects Trump administration's attempt to restrict mail-in votingabcnews.com · not rated · cited for: supports
- 5Supreme Court denies Trump administration's request to ...scotusblog.com · not rated · cited for: supports
- 6What’s next for mail voting after the Supreme Court ruled ... -...cnn.com · tier 2 · cited for: context
- 7Federal judge lifts final block on Trump mail-in voting ordercnbc.com · not rated · cited for: context
Where this claim was made
Said in 2 published posts
Related claims
- The Supreme Court blocked a Trump administration regulation regarding the United States Postal Service and mail-in ballots.True
- The Supreme Court blocked an executive order from the Trump administration that sought to change mail voting processes and give the U.S. Postal Service new abilities to decide who to deliver mail ballots to.True
- The Supreme Court declined to block an executive order that announced Donald Trump's plans to interfere with the election using the U.S. Postal Service.True
- The Supreme Court ruled against the Trump administration's request for new mail-in voting restrictions.True
- The Supreme Court issued a 7-2 ruling denying a stay on a lower court's injunction against Donald Trump's mail-in ballot restrictions for the U.S. Postal Service.True