The Trump administration has declassified sensitive material that state officials provided to CISA.
Posted by Deadline: White House, Checked
- Sources
- 3 support4 context
- Said
- 1 time·
- Confidence
- 60%
Deadline: White HouseOct 20, 2026
ProPublica's reporting, which the White House did not dispute on the release itself, says the administration declassified records that included raw state-shared material given to CISA.
Our two reads of who says this, and how, disagree, so it counts as the post's own claim.
What was said
… officials to learn from this, be prepared to stand up tall, where too many have before, not when the administration comes and tells lies and wants to take extraordinary measures. Heilman, let me read you another chunk of the ProPublica report: quote "In recent months, in reviving debunked theories about the 2020 election, the Trump administration has declassified troves of records, including sensitive material that state officials provided to CISA. Some state authorities said they no longer trusted the administration enough to share information with CISA, a key to the agency's success in past elections." …
Deadline: White House · · from the transcriptPost →What we found
Supports. ProPublica reports that the Trump administration declassified troves of records, including sensitive material state officials provided to CISA, and that the released material included raw information states had shared with the agency.[3]
Supports. PolitiFact reports that documents posted on a new White House website included material that had been declassified or partially redacted, which corroborates the declassification element in part.[1]
Supports. FactCheck.org confirms the White House released a trove of documents that Trump said showed intelligence agencies had kept election vulnerabilities secret.[2]
Contradicts. No source states that the released material did not include state-provided CISA information or that no declassification occurred; the White House spokesperson denied breaking agreements rather than denying the release.[3]
Context. Several later outlets (Truthdig, GovExec, Main Street Independent, NewsBreak) repeat the ProPublica wording, so they add no independent corroboration.[4][5][6][7]
Sources
7 sources: 2 fact-checkers, 1 tier 2, 3 not rated, 1 rated low
- 1Fact-checking Trump's address: What he said about China and ...politifact.com · fact-checker · cited for: supports
- 2FactChecking Trump's Election Security Speechfactcheck.org · fact-checker · cited for: supports
- 3Trump Appointees Asked a Federal Cybersecurity Agency to Secretly Acquire a Voting Machine — and Hack Itpropublica.org · tier 2 · cited for: contradicts, supports
- 4The Gutting of Election Securitytruthdig.com · not rated · cited for: context
- 5This cybersecurity agency is supposed to protect U.S. elections. Officials fear it’s been compromised by Trumpgovexec.com · not rated · cited for: context
- 6DHS appointees urged CISA to secretly hack voting machine, sources say — Main Street Independentmainstreetindependent.com · not rated · cited for: context
- 7Trump appointees asked federal cybersecurity agency to secretly acquire a voting machine and hack it - NewsBreaknewsbreak.com · rated low for factual reporting by Iffy.news · cited for: context
Where this claim was made
Said in 1 published post
Related claims
- Some state authorities have stopped sharing information with CISA due to a lack of trust in the Trump administration.True
- Political appointees at the Department of Homeland Security requested that CISA secretly acquire and hack a voting machine at the beginning of President Trump's second term.True
- Donald Trump signed CISA legislation into law that created election security architecture.True
- The Trump administration cut the CISA budget by one-third.Can’t tell
- The Trump administration has cut funds for election security.True