Polygraph

CISA employees were unable to fulfill the request to hack a voting machine because the agents capable of doing so had been laid off by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency initiative.

Posted by Deadline: White House, Checked

Polygraph verdictTrue
Sources
4 support2 context
Said
1 time·
Confidence
72%
Deadline: White HouseOct 20, 2026
View on Podcast ↗
Video frame
43 claimsThe check →

ProPublica reports that CISA employees told political appointees the hacking request was impossible, in part because the agents capable of such an operation had just been laid off by DOGE, and that the request was not acted on. The claim drops the qualifier "in part" but otherwise matches the reporting; independent 2025 reports corroborate that DOGE cut CISA red-team staff.

Our two reads of who says this, and how, disagree, so it counts as the post's own claim.

What was said

… The White House didn't answer Pro publica's questions about the hack. And in a twist of irony, Pro publica reports this, quote, "The CISA employees repeatedly told the political appointees that their request was impossible, in part because the agents capable of pulling off such an operation had just been laid off by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency initiative." So because of Trump destroyed the government through Elon Musk's Dog, she couldn't hack voting machines, even though the request was not ultimately fulfilled. …
Deadline: White House · · from the transcriptPost →

What we found

Supports. ProPublica (Oct 2026) reports CISA employees repeatedly told the political appointees the request was impossible, in part because the capable agents had just been laid off by DOGE, and the request was not acted on.[1]

Supports. Independent 2025 reporting from Bloomberg, TechCrunch and Infosecurity Magazine documents DOGE-driven firings of CISA red-team and cybersecurity staff, supporting the layoff premise.[2][3][4]

Context. Raw Story and Truthout repeat the ProPublica account, so they add no independent confirmation of the claim.[5][6]

Sources

6 sources: 2 tier 2, 3 not rated, 1 tier 3

  1. 1Trump Appointees Asked a Federal Cybersecurity Agency to Secretly Acquire a Voting Machine — and Hack Itpropublica.org · tier 2 · cited for: supports
  2. 2DHS Workers Tasked With Curbing Hacks Ousted in DOGE Squeezebloomberg.com · tier 2 · cited for: supports
  3. 3DOGE axes CISA ‘red team’ staffers amid ongoing federal cuts | TechCrunchtechcrunch.com · not rated · cited for: supports
  4. 4Trump Administration Shakes Up CISA with Staff and Funding Cutsinfosecurity-magazine.com · not rated · cited for: supports
  5. 5Officials fear cybersecurity agency meant to protect US ...rawstory.com · tier 3 · cited for: context
  6. 6Trump Appointees Asked a Federal Cybersecurity Agency ...truthout.org · not rated · cited for: context

Where this claim was made

Said in 1 published post

How Polygraph checks a claim

Our Weekly Newsletter

The Readout

The week's most-shared posts, checked. What they claimed, how they argued, and what held up.

Unsubscribe any time. See our privacy policy.