Polygraph

President Trump is trying to change how elections are run. Where do things stand?

Consider This from NPR, Checked

Polygraph score
100Holds up12 claims checked
Details
What it claims
13 true
How it argues
Nothing found
How it persuades
Nothing found
What it’s built on
Nothing found
Consider This from NPRAug 28, 2026
View on Podcast ↗
Consider This from NPR cover art
Consider This from NPRPresident Trump is trying to change how elections are run. Where do things stand?Whole episode, 8:47
Episode page →
13 claims

What it claims

Claims

  1. 1TruePresident Trump signed two executive orders, one aimed at new registration requirements and the other at voting by mail, both of which have been blocked by the courts.Sources show Trump signed a March 2025 order on voter registration (documentary proof of citizenship) and a March 31, 2026 order on mail voting, and courts blocked both before August 28, 2026: the registration order was permanently enjoined in June 2026 and the mail-voting order was enjoined in June 2026, with a further USPS rule blocked on August 27. The Supreme Court stayed part of the mail-voting injunction on August 24, so the block was partial and contested, but the claim's core assertion holds as of the posting date.6 sources →

    ▶ 2:23

  2. 2TruePresident Trump signed two executive orders aimed at new registration requirements and voting by mail.Sources confirm Trump signed two election executive orders: a first one aimed at registration (documentary proof of citizenship on the federal form, later blocked by courts) and a March 31, 2026 order (EO 14399) restricting mail-in ballot transmission via USPS. The claim matches the passage and the sources, and the orders are being challenged in court, as the passage says.7 sources →
  3. 3TrueThe two executive orders signed by President Trump regarding election procedures are being challenged in court.Both executive orders are being challenged in court as of 2026-08-28. Reuters and AP reported on August 24-25 that other challenges to the mail-voting order remained after the Supreme Court's stay, and the CRS report and Supreme Court syllabus document lawsuits against both March 2025 (EO 14248) and March 2026 (EO 14399) orders. The claim matches the post's wording, and the later developments (the Supreme Court stay, the later permanent injunctions) do not make the claim false as of that date.6 sources →
  4. 4OpinionThe author describes President Trump as having long repeated baseless claims about election fraud.A judgement, not a statement of fact. It has no true or false answer.

    ▶ 0:23

  5. 5TruePresident Trump signed an executive order in the spring of 2026 seeking to restrict mail-in voting.Multiple independent sources, including AP and Reuters, confirm that Trump signed an executive order on March 31, 2026, which falls in spring, seeking to restrict mail-in voting. The claim matches the passage's wording, and the order's later court blocks do not make the signing claim false.9 sources →

    ▶ 0:26

  6. 6TrueThe executive order restricting mail-in voting has been blocked by the courts.As of the August 28 posting date, an AP report says U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani blocked the order again on Thursday, August 27, for two weeks, so the claim that courts had blocked it is supported. Other sources say an earlier final block was lifted on August 26 and the Supreme Court paused a lower-court ruling, so the status was contested and temporary; the claim departs from the passage only in wording, not substance.6 sources →

    ▶ 0:31

  7. 7TrueThe Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security are investigating the 2020 election and voter fraud.The sources show that the Justice Department and DHS were investigating the 2020 election and alleged voter fraud as of late August 2026, including the Fulton County ballot seizure, a DOJ probe in Nevada, and DHS inquiries into alleged noncitizen voters. The claim is extracted faithfully from the NPR passage, and the sources say these probes have not turned up evidence supporting fraud claims, which the claim does not assert.6 sources →

    ▶ 2:32

  8. 8TrueA task force in the Senate, consisting of at least eleven Democratic offices, staff, outside litigators, and good governance groups, is working to respond to threats to the election process.Multiple sources, including the Senate Democrats' own press releases, NPR, WYPR and WSIU, confirm a Senate Democratic Election Protection Task Force of at least 11 senators' offices with staff and outside experts working to respond to threats to the 2026 midterm election process, as of August 28, 2026. The claim's broader inclusion of outside litigators and good governance groups is also supported, and the sources describe the group as active rather than merely planned.5 sources →

    ▶ 2:56

  9. 9TrueIt is a federal crime to send troops to a polling place.18 U.S.C. § 592 makes it a federal crime to bring or keep troops or armed men at a place where an election is held, so the claim's core holds. The claim omits the statute's narrow exception for force necessary to repel armed enemies of the United States, but that dropped qualifier does not reverse the claim.6 sources →

    ▶ 3:28

  10. 10TrueThe Department of Homeland Security stated that ICE agents would not be sent to the polls.DHS officials repeatedly stated that immigration agents would not be stationed at or sent to polling places, including a February 2026 briefing to state election officials that predates the August 28 post. Sources also note DHS did not rule out agents at a polling site in specific scenarios, and the AP account says DHS officials denied plans to send agents "en masse" to patrol the polls, so the claim's unqualified wording is slightly broader than the record.4 sources →

    ▶ 3:30

  11. 11TrueIneligible individuals casting ballots in American elections is not widespread enough to shape election outcomes.The claim that ineligible voting is not widespread enough to shape election outcomes is strongly supported by multiple sources, including a 2016 study of 42 jurisdictions finding about 30 suspected noncitizen votes out of 23.5 million, NYT reporting that noncitizen voting has never changed an outcome, and Brennan Center and PolitiFact findings that fraud is rare. The extraction faithfully drops the speaker's framing ('imaginary problem') and matches the passage's scope, which is 'American elections' generally.6 sources →

    ▶ 4:34

  12. 12TrueMike Johnson played a central role in Donald Trump's legal efforts to remain in power in 2020 and 2021.Multiple independent tier1 and tier2 sources (AP, Reuters, PolitiFact, NBC, NYT, POLITICO) document that Mike Johnson, before becoming Speaker, played a leading role in the effort to overturn the 2020 election results, including leading the amicus brief backing the Texas lawsuit and voting against certification in January 2021. The claim's extraction faithfully tracks the passage, and the 2020-2021 timeframe matches the documented efforts.8 sources →

    ▶ 5:00

  13. 13TrueVoter turnout in the 2022 midterm elections was lower than in the 2020 and 2024 presidential elections.Multiple independent reliable sources show 2022 midterm turnout (roughly 45–52% depending on measure) was well below the 2020 presidential turnout (about 65–66% of eligible voters) and the 2024 presidential turnout (about 63–65%). The extracted claim is a faithful paraphrase of the post's statement that 2022 lagged behind 2020 and 2024.6 sources →

    ▶ 6:14

  14. 14TrueVanita Gupta served as the number three official in the Department of Justice during the Biden administration.The sources consistently show Vanita Gupta was confirmed as Associate Attorney General on April 21, 2021 and was the third-ranking official at the Justice Department under President Biden until her resignation effective February 2024, so the claim holds. The claim matches the passage's wording, which says she was the number three in Biden's DOJ.7 sources →

    ▶ 7:13

Sources

Fact-checkers 18Primary records 20Most reliable outlets 1Reliable outlets 13Unrated 27

How Polygraph reads a postHow often are we wrong?

Our Weekly Newsletter

The Readout

The week's most-shared posts, checked. What they claimed, how they argued, and what held up.

Unsubscribe any time. See our privacy policy.