Polygraph

Fulton County officials have hidden ballots for five years and violated Georgia open records request law multiple times.

Posted by Bannon`s War Room, Checked

Polygraph verdictMixed
Sources
3 contradict2 support2 context
Said
1 time·
Confidence
50%
Bannon`s War RoomJul 27, 2026
View on Podcast ↗
Video frame
53 claimsThe check →

The sources show Fulton County ballot records have been contested for years, with the DOJ complaint and state board findings documenting records-retention disputes and the FBI seizing ballots in January 2026, and the Favorito litigation involved Open Records Act claims.

A guest makes this claim. Listeners heard it, so it counts against the post, and on the guest's own record.

What was said

… They need the line of defense that they will never give up is Fulton County, because inside the rat's nest that is Fulton County explains the entire thing, does it not, Garland Favretto? Well, absolutely, Steven. This is why they have hid those ballots for five years and violated Georgia open records request law multiple times. They are still refusing to give up ballots and even the ballot images, which we've already got through our court case and discovery, but that is why they have hidden these ballots in the change, the, in the change the conversation. …
Bannon`s War Room · · from the transcriptPost →

What we found

Contradicts. NPR analysis reports that state investigators found only isolated examples of Fulton County workers violating rules and that the 2020 ballots were counted three separate times with results affirmed, undercutting the wrongdoing framing.[3]

Contradicts. Fulton County's own records portal describes its compliance with the Georgia Open Records Act, and the Favorito litigation shows Open Records claims against the county were dismissed, cutting against a finding of repeated violations.[1][4]

Supports. A DOJ complaint against Fulton County officials documents that election records retention obligations were litigated after an October 30, 2025 demand letter, showing a federal records dispute exists.[2]

Supports. The Favorito litigation included Open Records Act claims against Fulton County, indicating the open records dispute is real, though the court dismissed those claims as already adjudicated in a prior order.[4][5]

Context. The 2026 FBI seizure of ballots and Fulton's Rule 41(g) motion show the ballots were contested in litigation, but sources do not establish a five-year concealment by county officials; the 'five years' and 'multiple violations' framing comes from advocacy coverage (VoterGA press release) rather than independent records.[6][7]

Sources

7 sources: 2 primary, 5 not rated

  1. 1County Attorney Open records requestsfultoncountyga.gov · primary source · cited for: contradicts
  2. 2Complaint - US v Che Alexander of Fulton Countyjustice.gov · primary source · cited for: supports
  3. 3The FBI seizure of Georgia 2020 election ballots relies on debunked ...kenw.org · not rated · cited for: contradicts
  4. 4Favorito v. Wancase-law.vlex.com · not rated · cited for: contradicts, supports
  5. 5GARLAND FAVORITO et al v. ALEX WAN et allaw.justia.com · not rated · cited for: supports
  6. 6Five-Year VoterGA Battle Exposes Fulton County Ballot Cover-Up - Christian Newswirechristiannewswire.com · not rated · cited for: context
  7. 7Fulton County's Battle for Ballots: A Primerlawfaremedia.org · not rated · cited for: context

Where this claim was made

Said in 1 published post

How Polygraph checks a claim

Our Weekly Newsletter

The Readout

The week's most-shared posts, checked. What they claimed, how they argued, and what held up.

Unsubscribe any time. See our privacy policy.