Federal agents busted a California voter fraud network earlier this week in Operation Protect The Vote.

Posted by Ask Dr. Drew, Oct 21, 2026Checked Nov 2, 2026

Polygraph verdictTrue

Sources: 5 support3 context
Said: 1 time·
Confidence: 85%

Ask Dr. DrewOct 21, 2026

… Byrne, a $1.7 billion defamation case. Eric Bolling returns with an update on the economy and the midterm elections. And Michael Gates, who is running for Attorney General of California, speaks on election security in the Golden State – and how federal agents busted a California voter fraud network earlier this week in “Operation Protect The Vote.” The NY Post reports that “Gov. Gavin Newsom blasted the effort as an attempt to interfere with California’s voting process.” …

72 claimsThe check →

The Justice Department and AP both report that federal agents arrested 28 charged individuals in California on Monday, October 19, 2026, as part of 'Operation Protect the Vote,' a coordinated effort across the state's four U.S. Attorney's Offices. The post was made October 21, so 'earlier this week' matches the arrest date.

This claim is in the show notes, the publisher's own words. It counts against the post, once.

What we found

Supports. The DOJ press release states that federal law enforcement arrested 11 foreign nationals and charged 28 in California on October 19, 2026, as part of 'Operation Protect the Vote,' a coordinated effort among all four California U.S. Attorney's Offices.[3]

Supports. AP reports that federal authorities charged more than two dozen foreign nationals on Monday in California as part of a statewide sweep, and Reuters confirms the October 19 charges against 28 people.[1][2]

Supports. NY Post and AllSides describe the operation as the state's biggest such takedown, dubbed 'Operation Protect the Vote,' with defendants charged with false naturalization statements and fraudulent voter registration.[4][5]

Context. The charged individuals deny the allegations and are charged rather than convicted; state officials such as AG Bonta dispute the significance of the arrests but do not deny that they occurred.[7][8]

Context. A later court ruling rejected the administration's lawsuit seeking to exclude California ballots, which concerns a separate action and does not contradict the October arrests.[6]